Wareka v. Lenox Aesthetics Inc. et al
Tamara Wareka p/k/a Tamara Williams |
Lenox Aesthetics Inc. and DOES 1-10, inclusive |
1:2022cv06213 |
July 21, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
J Paul Oetken |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Order entered 9-9-22 served on Lenox Aesthetics, Inc. on 09/12/2022. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Tamara Wareka p/k/a Tamara Williams..(Ngo, Rayminh) |
Filing 10 ORDER: If Plaintiff fails by September 21, 2022, to either (1) file a letter concerning the status of the case, or (2) move for default judgment against Defendant, the action may be dismissed for failure to prosecute. ( Motions due by 9/21/2022.) (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 9/9/2022) (ate) |
Filing 9 ORDER: If Plaintiff fails by September 21, 2022, to either (1) file a letter concerning the status of the case, or (2) move for default judgment against Defendant, the action may be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff is directed to serve a copy of this order by mail on Defendant. ( Motions due by 9/21/2022.) (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 9/9/2022) (ate) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Lenox Aesthetics Inc. served on 8/11/2022, answer due 9/1/2022. Service was accepted by HELEN S.. Document filed by Tamara Wareka p/k/a Tamara Williams..(Ngo, Rayminh) |
Filing 7 AO 121 FORM COPYRIGHT - CASE OPENING - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 17 U.S.C. 508, the Register of Copyrights is hereby advised that a court action has been filed on the following copyright(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Form e-mailed to Register of Copyrights..(pc) |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Lenox Aesthetics Inc...(pc) |
Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge J. Paul Oetken. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties. Document filed by Tamara Wareka p/k/a Tamara Williams..(Ngo, Rayminh) |
Filing 4 AO 121 FORM COPYRIGHT - NOTICE OF SUBMISSION BY ATTORNEY. AO 121 Form Copyright for case opening submitted to court for review..(Ngo, Rayminh) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Lenox Aesthetics Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Tamara Wareka p/k/a Tamara Williams..(Ngo, Rayminh) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Ngo, Rayminh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DOES 1-10, inclusive, Lenox Aesthetics Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26447908)Document filed by Tamara Wareka p/k/a Tamara Williams. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-C).(Ngo, Rayminh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.