I.A. et al v. New York City Department of Education
Plaintiff: I.A. and S.A.
Defendant: NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Case Number: 1:2022cv06449
Filed: July 29, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Lorna G Schofield
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Education
Cause of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 IDEA: Challenge decision re education for handicapped
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that by October 4, 2022, the parties shall return an executed Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form to the Clerk of Court, if the parties agree to conduct all further proceedings before Judge Willis, in compliance with Rule 73.1 of the Local Civil Rules for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York. It is further ORDERED that by October 18, 2022, Plaintiff shall file a motion for summary judgment, not to exceed 25 pages. By November 8, 2022, Defendant shall file the opposition and any cross-motion for summary judgment, not to exceed 30 pages. By November 29, 2022, Plaintiff shall file a reply and opposition to Defendant's cross-motion for summary judgment if any, not to exceed 15 pages. By December 13, 2022, Defendant shall file a reply in support of the cross-motion for summary judgment if any, not to exceed 10 pages. ( Cross Motions due by 11/8/2022., Motions due by 10/18/2022., Responses due by 11/29/2022, Replies due by 12/13/2022.) (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 9/26/2022) (ate)
September 21, 2022 Filing 13 ANSWER to #1 Complaint. Document filed by New York City Department of Education..(Lindeman, Thomas)
September 21, 2022 Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Thomas Lindeman on behalf of New York City Department of Education..(Lindeman, Thomas)
August 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting in part and denying in part #9 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #9 FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer addressed to Judge Lorna G. Schofield from Martin Bowe dated 8.19.2022.. Application GRANTED IN PART. By September 21, 2022, Defendant shall file an answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the motion at Docket No. 8.. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 8/19/2022) (ks)
August 19, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Martin John Bowe, Jr on behalf of New York City Department of Education..(Bowe, Martin)
August 19, 2022 Filing 9 FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer addressed to Judge Lorna G. Schofield from Martin Bowe dated 8.19.2022. Document filed by New York City Department of Education..(Bowe, Martin)
August 19, 2022 Set/Reset Deadlines: New York City Department of Education answer due 9/21/2022. (ks)
August 18, 2022 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY ERROR. Notice to Attorney Wynstelle Nicholson to RE-FILE Document #7 Notice (Other). ERROR(S): Attorney signature does not match Attorney filer. (kj)
August 18, 2022 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY ERROR. Notice to Attorney Wynstelle Nicholson to RE-FILE Document #8 FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer On Consent addressed to Judge Lorna G. Schofield from Martin Bowe dated August 18, 2022.. ERROR(S): Attorney signature does not match Attorney filer. (kj)
August 18, 2022 Filing 8 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer On Consent addressed to Judge Lorna G. Schofield from Martin Bowe dated August 18, 2022. Document filed by New York City Department of Education..(Nicholson, Wynstelle) Modified on 8/19/2022 (kj).
August 18, 2022 Filing 7 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - NOTICE of Appearance of Martin Bowe. Document filed by New York City Department of Education..(Nicholson, Wynstelle) Modified on 8/19/2022 (kj).
August 1, 2022 Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons served on New York City Department of Education on 8/1/22. Document filed by I.A.(individually), I.A.(on behalf of E.A.), S.A.(individually), S.A.(on behalf of E.A.)..(Dayan, Adam)
August 1, 2022 Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to New York City Department of Education. (sj)
August 1, 2022 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Adam Dayan. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name was entered in all caps. (sj)
August 1, 2022 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Lorna G. Schofield. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(sj)
August 1, 2022 Magistrate Judge Jennifer Willis is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sj)
August 1, 2022 Case Designated ECF. (sj)
July 29, 2022 Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Dayan, Adam)
July 29, 2022 Filing 3 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by I.A.(individually), I.A.(on behalf of E.A.), S.A.(individually), S.A.(on behalf of E.A.)..(Dayan, Adam)
July 29, 2022 Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to New York City Department of Education, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by I.A.(individually), I.A.(on behalf of E.A.), S.A.(individually), S.A.(on behalf of E.A.)..(Dayan, Adam)
July 29, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26481144)Document filed by S.A.(individually), I.A.(individually), I.A.(on behalf of E.A.), S.A.(on behalf of E.A.)..(Dayan, Adam)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: I.A. et al v. New York City Department of Education
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: I.A.
Represented By: Adam Dayan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: S.A.
Represented By: Adam Dayan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Represented By: Martin John Bowe, Jr
Represented By: Thomas Lindeman
Represented By: Wynstelle Simone Nicholson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?