Haynes v. Laidlaw & Company (UK) Ltd.
| Osbert Haynes |
| Laidlaw & Company (UK) Ltd. |
| 1:2022cv06464 |
| July 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Analisa Torres |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Equal Rights Under the Law |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER: To protect the public health, while promoting the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding," Fed. R. Civ. P. 1, it is ORDERED pursuant to Rules 30(b)(3) and 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that all depositions in this action may be taken via telephone, videoconference, or other remote means. It is further ORDERED pursuant to Rule 30(b)(5) that a deposition will be deemed to have taken place "before an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28" if such officer attends the deposition using the same remote means used to connect all other participants, so long as all participants (including the officer) can clearly hear and be heard by all other participants. The parties are encouraged to engage in discovery through remote means at every available opportunity. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 8/1/2022) (kv)
|
|
Filing 8
INITIAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Counsel for all parties are directed to submit a joint letter and a jointly proposed Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order by November 28, 2022, in accordance with Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the instructions set forth below. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 8/1/2022) (kv)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER: To conserve resources, to promote judicial efficiency, and in an effort to achieve a faster disposition of this matter, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge. (as further set forth herein). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 8/1/2022) (kv)
|
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Laidlaw & Company (UK) Ltd...(pc) |
| Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
| Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Analisa Torres. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Gabrielle Vinci on behalf of Osbert Haynes..(Vinci, Gabrielle) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Andrew Todd Miltenberg on behalf of Osbert Haynes..(Miltenberg, Andrew) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Laidlaw & Company (UK) Ltd., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Osbert Haynes..(Lewis, Nicholas) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Lewis, Nicholas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Laidlaw & Company (UK) Ltd.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26483342)Document filed by Osbert Haynes..(Lewis, Nicholas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Haynes v. Laidlaw & Company (UK) Ltd. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Osbert Haynes | |
| Represented By: | Andrew Todd Miltenberg |
| Represented By: | Gabrielle Vinci |
| Represented By: | Nicholas Evan Lewis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Laidlaw & Company (UK) Ltd. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
