Phadnis v. Williams et al
| Pankaj Kumudchandra Phadnis |
| Damian Williams, Ratan Tata, Natarajan Chandrasekaran, Sir Dorabji Tata Trust and Tata Sons Pvt Ltd |
| 1:2022cv06500 |
| August 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Laura Taylor Swain |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (aea) |
| Filing 21 LETTER addressed to Judge Laura Taylor Swain from P. Phadnis, dated 8/23/22 re: "ORDER OF DISMISSAL PRO SE FILING 22-CV-6500(LTS) ECF 19 & ECF 20" - As I understand, based on the facts on record at present, I can seek to invoke Federal Question Jurisdiction of the Court only upon applying for a Visa and in the event of its denial and/or it not being processed etc. Document filed by Pankaj Kumudchandra Phadnis.(sc) |
Filing 20
CIVIL JUDGMENT: For the reasons stated in the August 22, 2022, order, this action is dismissed. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith. SO ORDERED (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 8/22/22) (rdz)
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted, and for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). The motion for mediation is denied as moot, and the Clerk of Court is directed to terminate it. (ECF 5.) The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to issue judgment in this case. SO ORDERED. denying as moot #5 Motion for Mediation. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 8/22/22) (rdz) Modified on 8/22/2022 (rdz).
|
| Filing 18 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Natarajan Chandrasekaran, served on 8/12/2022, answer due 9/2/2022. Service was made by email to nchangra@tata.com. Document filed by Pankaj Kumudchandra Phadnis. (sc) |
| Filing 17 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Summons and Complaint, served. Sir Dorabji Tata Trust served on 8/12/2022, answer due 9/2/2022. Service was accepted by Ashish Deshpande. Document filed by Pankaj Kumudchandra Phadnis. (sc) |
| Filing 16 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Summons and Complaint, served. Ratan Tata, served on 8/12/2022, answer due 9/2/2022. Service was made by via Email to mtata@tata.com. Document filed by Pankaj Kumudchandra Phadnis. (sc) |
| Filing 15 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Summons and Complaint, served. Tata Sons Pvt Ltd., served on 8/12/2022, answer due 9/2/2022. Service was accepted by Suprakash Mukhopadhyay. Document filed by Pankaj Kumudchandra Phadnis. (sc) |
| Filing 14 LETTER from P. Phadnis, dated 8/12/22 re: "SERVICE OF SUMMONS ON DEFENDANT NO. 2, 3, 4 AND 5 ETC."- These defendants are residents of the Republic of India. The service is in conformity with applicable laws in India and therefore in conformity with FRCP 4(f)(2)(A) for service on parties outside of the U.S. Document filed by Pankaj Kumudchandra Phadnis.(sc) |
| Filing 13 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Tata Sons Pvt Ltd. (aan) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Natarajan Chandrasekaran. (aan) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Ratan Tata. (aan) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Damian Williams. (aan) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Sir Dorabji Tata Trust. (aan) |
| Mailed a copy of #10 Summons Issued, #12 Summons Issued, #13 Summons Issued, #9 Summons Issued, #11 Summons Issued to Pankaj Kumudchandra Phadnis 71 Savarkar Sadan, Dr. M.B. Raut Shivaji Park, Dadar (W) Mumbai, 400028, Maharashtra India. (aan) |
| Pro Se Payment of Fee Processed: $402.00 Check processed by the Finance Department on 08/08/2022, Receipt Number 3906. (ps) |
| Filing 8 LETTER from P. Phadnis, dated 8/8/22 re: "REFERENCE TO MEDIATION(ECF #5 & ECF #6)"- It is respectfully requested that the case may be referred to Mediation as per Notice of Motion (ECF #5) on the basis of facts detailed in the Declaration in Support of the Motion(ECF 6). Document filed by Pankaj Kumudchandra Phadnis.(sc) |
| Filing 7 LETTER from P. Phadnis, dated 8/8/22 re: "ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS (ECF 3)" - As per the information available on web site of United States Postal Service vide tracking number 9505 5145 5632 6311 99, the Court fees were delivered on 8/5/22 at 11:33 am. Document filed by Pankaj Kumudchandra Phadnis.(sc) |
| Filing 6 DECLARATION of P. Phadnis IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR MEDIATION, re: #5 MOTION for Mediation. Document filed by Pankaj Kumudchandra Phadnis. (sc) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF MOTION, Re: for Mediation under Local Civil Rule 83.9 for a period of 60 days. Document filed by Pankaj Kumudchandra Phadnis.(sc) |
| Filing 4 LETTER from P. Phadnis, dated 8/4/22 re: "COURT FEES FOR NEW CASE, 1-22-CV-6500 UA" - The Court fees of $402.00 has been dispatched today by Priority Mail Service of the United States Postal Service. On receipt of the Court fees, it is submitted that Summons may be issued to the defendants. Document filed by Pankaj Kumudchandra Phadnis.(sc) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Damian Williams, Ratan Tata, Natarajan Chandrasekaran, Sir Dorabji Tata Trust, Tata Sons Pvt Ltd, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Pankaj Kumudchandra Phadnis. (sac) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE CONSENT TO RECEIVE ELECTRONIC SERVICE. The following party: Pankaj Kumudchandra Phadnis consents to receive electronic service via the ECF system. Document filed by Pankaj Kumudchandra Phadnis. (sac) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Tata Sons Pvt Ltd, Natarajan Chandrasekaran, Sir Dorabji Tata Trust, Ratan Tata, Damian Williams. Document filed by Pankaj Kumudchandra Phadnis. (Attachments: #1 Main Document, #2 Main Document, #3 Exhibit A, Part I, #4 Exhibit A, Part II, #5 Exhibit B, #6 Exhibit C, #7 Exhibit D, #8 Exhibit E, #9 Exhibit F, #10 Exhibit G, #11 Exhibit H, #12 Exhibit I, Part I, #13 Exhibit I, Part II, #14 Exhibit J, #15 Exhibit K, #16 Exhibit L, #17 Exhibit M, Part I, #18 Exhibit M, Part II) (sac) Modified on 8/1/2022 (sac). |
| Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
