Delacruz v. Elon University
Emanuel Delacruz |
Elon University |
1:2022cv06571 |
August 2, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Valerie E Caproni |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 MEMO ENDORSEMENT: on re: #11 Letter filed by Emanuel Delacruz. ENDORSEMENT: The Court will not impose sanctions. Counsel is warned that the Court will not be so understanding in the future. Similar incidents in the future, including in other cases, may result in sanctions. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 9/07/2022) (ama) |
Filing 11 LETTER addressed to Judge Valerie E. Caproni from Jeffrey M. Gottlieb dated August 29, 2022 re: Extension of time. Document filed by Emanuel Delacruz..(Gottlieb, Jeffrey) |
Filing 10 ORDER denying as moot #8 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #8 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint addressed to Judge Valerie E. Caproni from Samuel B. Hartzell dated August 26, 2022., #1 Complaint. Application DENIED as moot. Defendant's deadline to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint is December 2, 2022, the date of the initial pretrial conference. See Order, Dkt. 6 (using bold font). The Court encourages Defense Counsel to read all court orders and rules more carefully. The Court has previously warned Plaintiff's Counsel "who has appeared before the Undersigned in dozens of website ADA cases and is therefore very familiar with the Court's orders and practices" against agreeing "to needless, moot requests to answer deadlines by Defense Counsel." Young v. The Brooklyn Academy of Music, Inc., No. 22-cv-1723, Dkt. 11. The Court has also warned Plaintiff's Counsel that consenting to additional moot requests to adjourn answer deadlines "may result in sanctions." Id. By no later than Friday, September 2, 2022, Plaintiff's Counsel must show cause as to why they should not be sanctioned for agreeing to an unnecessary extension of time. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 8/29/2022) (tg) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Elon University answer due 12/2/2022. (tg) |
Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. Elon University served on 8/9/2022, answer due 8/30/2022. Service was accepted by Lisa Williams, Admin. Asst.. Document filed by Emanuel Delacruz..(Gottlieb, Jeffrey) |
Filing 8 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint addressed to Judge Valerie E. Caproni from Samuel B. Hartzell dated August 26, 2022. Document filed by Elon University..(Hartzell, Samuel) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Samuel B. Hartzell on behalf of Elon University..(Hartzell, Samuel) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE FOR CASES FILED UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT: Initial Conference set for 12/2/2022 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 443, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Valerie E. Caproni. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 8/3/2022) (tg) |
Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Elon University..(pc) |
Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Valerie E. Caproni. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc) |
Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jeffrey Michael Gottlieb on behalf of Emanuel Delacruz..(Gottlieb, Jeffrey) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(LaBollita, Michael) |
Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Elon University, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Emanuel Delacruz..(LaBollita, Michael) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Elon University. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26496174)Document filed by Emanuel Delacruz..(LaBollita, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Delacruz v. Elon University | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Emanuel Delacruz | |
Represented By: | Jeffrey Michael Gottlieb |
Represented By: | Michael A. LaBollita |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Elon University | |
Represented By: | Samuel B. Hartzell |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.