Komatsu v. The City of New York et al
Towaki Komatsu |
The City of New York, Silverstein Properties, Inc., Steven Banks, Harriette Boutrin, Martha Calhoun, Simone Foster, Jeffrey Mosezye, Molly Park, Vincent Pullo, Paul Romain, Ann Marie Scalia, Manvir Singh, Juan Battle, Richard Duran, Ryan Dwyer, Nunziato, Rafi, Adrienne Adams, Robert Cornegy, Jr., Andy King, Stephen Levin, Ritchie Torres, Danielle Drasser, Hannah Faddis, Jonathan Poplow, Andrew Spears, Rosemary Yogiaveetil, John Doe 1, Jane Doe 1, John Doe 2 and John Doe 3 |
1:2022cv06627 |
August 3, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Laura Taylor Swain |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 LETTER addressed to Judge Laura Taylor Swain from T. Komatsu, dated 9/12/22 re: I am filing this letter in response to having just learned that the New York City Human Resources Administration issued a public notice earlier today which is available at https//:a856-cityrecord.nyc.gov/Request Detail/20220906044 in an official New York City Government report known as the City Record. That public notice is about HRA's intent to conduct a public hearing on 9/22/22 at 10:00 am about a proposed contract between HRA and Urban Pathways, Inc. etc. Document filed by Towaki Komatsu.(sc) |
Filing 12 LETTER addressed to Judge Laura Taylor Swain from T. Komatsu, dated 9/10/22 re: I got further confirmation today that Judge Ramos is clearly and illegally discriminating with your tacit or explicit approval that demands your recusal from all litigation involving me as well as the immediate reassignment of such litigation together with the consolidated case of Komatsu v. City of New York, #20-cv-746(ER)(GWG) that is hereinafter referred to as "K1" etc. Document filed by Towaki Komatsu.(sc) |
Filing 11 LETTER addressed to Judge Laura Taylor Swain from T. Komatsu, dated 9/7/22 re: I am filing this letter to further supplement my earlier request today to be granted reconsideration about your 8/15/22 order in this case on different grounds than what I discussed in that earlier letter today. My grounds in this letter for seeking that reconsideration are due to the following reasons: You made the following baseless, premature, prejudicial, vacuously shortsighted, and otherwise irrelevant claims in your 8/15/22 order in this case: "Here, Plaintiff attempts to join many unrelated parties and claims in a single action, which he cannot do" etc. Document filed by Towaki Komatsu.(sc) Modified on 9/8/2022 (sc). |
Filing 10 LETTER addressed to Judge Laura Taylor Swain from T. Komatsu, dated 9/7/22 re: I am filing this letter to further request reconsideration about your 8/15/22 order in this case etc. While making the preceding remarks(as previously indicated) in that order, you prejudicially ignored the fact that U.S. District Judge Edgardo Ramos has been continuously and illegally ignoring my submissions in K1. He has continued to do so after I filed my 9/2/22 letter in K1 to request retroactive authorization to pursue a new civil action etc. Document filed by Towaki Komatsu.(sc) |
Filing 9 LETTER addressed to Judge Laura Taylor Swain from T. Komatsu, dated 9/1/22 re: In short, this means that you prejudicially opted to defy my First and Fourteenth Amendment rights as well as the rules of conduct for United States judges by dismissing this case while relying on Judge Ramos' wholly unreliable, illegal and discriminatory 12/15/20 filing restrictions on me. Document filed by Towaki Komatsu.(sc) |
Filing 8 LETTER addressed to Judge Laura Taylor Swain from T. Komatsu, dated 8/16/22 re: I am filing this letter to apprise you about the critically significant fact that I learned tonight that U. S. District Judge Edgardo Ramos has been subjecting me to criminal obstruction of justice and discrimination all along since 12/15/20 in the consolidated case of Komatsu v. City of New York No. 20cv7046(ER)(GWG)(SDNY) that demands immediate, decisive, and comprehensive corrective action by you etc. Document filed by Towaki Komatsu.(sc) |
Filing 7 LETTER addressed to Judge Laura Taylor Swain from T. Komatsu, dated 8/16/22 re: I am filing this letter in response to the orders that you issued yesterday in the first three cases of mine listed above. I am facing a deadline of 8/29/22 to submit a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court in response to 18-cv-3698(LGS); and 21-cv-2470(2d Cir 3/30/22) etc. Document filed by Towaki Komatsu, Towaki Komatsu.(sc) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEAL from #3 Order of Dismissal. Document filed by Towaki Komatsu. Form D-P is due within 14 days to the Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. (tp) |
Appeal Record Sent to USCA (Electronic File). Certified Indexed record on Appeal Electronic Files for #6 Notice of Appeal filed by Towaki Komatsu were transmitted to the U.S. Court of Appeals. (tp) |
Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Certified Copy of Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re: #6 Notice of Appeal. (tp) |
Appeal Fee Due: for #6 Notice of Appeal. Appeal fee due by 8/30/2022. (tp) |
Appeal Remark as to #6 Notice of Appeal filed by Towaki Komatsu. IFP Denied 08/15/2022. (tp) |
MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 3-4. Mailed to: Towaki Komatsu 802 Fairmount Pl. Apt. 4B Bronx, NY 10460. (kh) |
Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION: Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees is authorized. 28 U.S.C. 1915. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 8/15/2022) (vn) |
Filing 4 CIVIL JUDGMENT: For the reasons stated in the August 15, 2022, order, this action is dismissed. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 8/15/2022) (Attachments: #1 Pro Se Appeal Package) (sac) |
Filing 3 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: Plaintiff's complaint, filed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1), is dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply with the prefiling injunction, Komatsu, ECF 1:20-CV-7046, 45. All filing restrictions remain in effect. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in this case. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 8/15/2022) (sac) |
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (vba) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Silverstein Properties, Inc., The City of New York, Steven Banks, Harriette Boutrin, Martha Calhoun, Simone Foster, Jeffrey Mosczyc, Molly Park, Vincent Pullo, Paul Romain, Ann Marie Scalia, Manvir Singh, NYPD Detective Juan Battle, NYPD Officer Richard Duran (shield #: 466), NYPD Sergeant Ryan Dwyer, NYPD Officer Nunziato (shield #: 1905), NYPD Detective Rafi (shield #: 1044), Adrienne Adams, Robert Cornegy, Jr., Andy King, Stephen Levin, Ritchie Torres, Danielle Drasser, Hannah Faddis, Jonathan Popolow, Andrew Spears, Rosemary Yogiaveetil, 2/24/22 John Doe1 and 2/24/22 Jane Doe1, HRA 10/19/17 security John Doe1, HRA 10/19/17 security John Doe2, HRA 10/19/17 messenger center John Doe1, HRA 10/19/17 messenger center John Doe2, HRA 10/19/17 messenger center John Doe3. . Document filed by Towaki Komatsu.(rdz) Modified on 8/11/2022 (sac). |
Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Towaki Komatsu..(rdz) |
Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.