Izuogu v. Aramark Food Services
ANTHONY IZUOGU |
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES |
1:2022cv06789 |
August 9, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
John G Koeltl |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO REMAND. Document filed by Anthony Izuogu. (ok) |
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge John G. Koeltl. Judge Colleen McMahon is no longer assigned to the case. (aea) |
Mailed a copy of #13 Order for Initial Pretrial Conference to Anthony Izougu at 805 New York Avenue, E5, Union City, NJ 07087. (kh) |
Filing 13 ORDER SCHEDULING AN INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Initial Conference by telephone set for 1/5/2023 at 11:45 AM before Judge Colleen McMahon. Parties should dial in at 1(888) 363-4749, access code (9054506) to join the conference. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 9/16/2022) (vfr) |
Filing 12 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: #11 MOTION to Remand to State Court. . Document filed by Aramark Food Services..(Heckman, August) |
Filing 11 PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF MOTION & MOTION TO REMAND TO STATE COURT(AMENDED). Document filed by Anthony Izuogu. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(sc) |
Filing 10 APPLICATION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS. Document filed by Anthony Izuogu. (Attachments: #1 Main Document)(sc) |
Filing 9 PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF MOTION & MOTION TO REMAND TO STATE COURT. Document filed by Anthony Izuogu. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(sc) |
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #6 MOTION to Dismiss . . Document filed by Aramark Food Services..(Heckman, August) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss . Document filed by Aramark Food Services..(Heckman, August) |
Filing 5 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent ARAMARK Intermediate Holdco Corporation, Corporate Parent Aramark Facility Services, LLC, Corporate Parent Aramark for Aramark Food Services. Document filed by Aramark Food Services..(Heckman, August) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Notice to Attorney August W. Heckman to RE-FILE Document No. #3 Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement,. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): not all corporate parents/other affiliates were added;. Re-file the document using the event type Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement found under the event list Other Documents - select the correct filer/filers - attach the correct PDF - when prompted with the message "Are there any corporate parents or other affiliates?", select the Yes radio button - enter the corporate parent/other affiliate, click the Search button - select the correct corporate parent/other affiliate name from the search results list or if no person found, create a new corporate parent/other affiliate - select the party to whom the corporate parent/other affiliate should be linked - add corporate parent/other affiliate names one at a time. (lb) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Supreme Court, County of New York. Case Number: 100625-22..Document filed by Aramark Food Services. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint).(Heckman, August) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney August W. Heckman, III. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: ANTHONY IZUOGU, ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name was entered in all caps. (sj) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney August W. Heckman, III to RE-FILE Document No. #1 Notice of Removal. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Pursuant to ECF Filing Rule 13.3, Notice of Removal exhibits must be filed as attachments and labeled. Each attachment must be clearly titled in the ECF entry so the subject of the exhibit is clear. They cannot be labeled 'Exhibit A, Exhibit B, etc.'. Re-file the pleading using the event type Notice of Removal found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. (sj) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney August W. Heckman, III. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Jurisdiction code 3 (Federal Question); Nature of Suit code 790 (Labor: Other); Citizenship Plaintiff (None); Citizenship Defendant (None); County code Queens. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Jurisdiction code has been modified to 4 (Diversity); the Nature of Suit code has been modified to 442 (Civil Rights: Jobs); the Citizenship Plaintiff code has been modified to 2 (Citizen of Another State); the Citizenship Defendant code has been modified to 5 (Incorporated/Principal Place of Business-Other State); the County code has been modified to XX Out of State. (sj) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Colleen McMahon. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(sj) |
Magistrate Judge James L. Cott is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sj) |
Case Designated ECF. (sj) |
Filing 3 FILING ERROR - NOT ALL CORPORATE PARENTS/OTHER AFFILIATES WERE ADDED - RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent Aramark Services, Inc. for ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES. Document filed by ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES..(Heckman, August) Modified on 8/11/2022 (lb). |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Heckman, August) |
Filing 1 FILING ERROR - EXHIBITS NOT CLEARLY TITLED NOTICE OF REMOVAL from SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, County of NEW YORK. Case Number: 100625-22. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26526471).Document filed by ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A).(Heckman, August) Modified on 8/10/2022 (sj). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Izuogu v. Aramark Food Services | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: ANTHONY IZUOGU | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES | |
Represented By: | August W. Heckman, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.