Wilson v. AutoWeb, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Jordan Wilson
Defendant: AutoWeb, Inc., Michael J. Fuchs, Matias de Tezanos, Mark N. Kaplan, Jared R. Rowe, Janet M. Thompson and Jose Vargas
Case Number: 1:2022cv06818
Filed: August 10, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Jesse M Furman
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL. Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), plaintiff Jordan Wilson ("Plaintiff") voluntarily dismisses the claims in the captioned action (the"Action"). Because this notice of dismissal is being filed with the Court before service by defendants of either an answer or a motion for summary judgment, Plaintiff's dismissal of the Action is effective upon the filing of this notice. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 9/16/22) (yv)
September 15, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, and without costs against the defendant(s) AutoWeb, Inc., Michael J. Fuchs, Mark N. Kaplan, Jared R. Rowe, Janet M. Thompson, Jose Vargas, Matias de Tezanos. Document filed by Jordan Wilson. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Acocelli, Richard)
September 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER. Unless and until the Court orders otherwise, the initial pre-trial conference on November 17, 2022, will proceed as scheduled. 22-CV-6648, ECF No. 3. It is further ORDERED that the Plaintiffs shall promptly serve a copy of this Order on each of the Defendants and file proof of service on the docket. The Clerk of Court is directed to consolidate 22-CV-6648, 22-CV-6793, 22-CV-6799, 22-CV-6818, and 22-CV-6893 under case number 22-CV-6648, and to close 22-CV-6793, 22-CV-6799, 22-CV-6818, and 22-CV-6893. All future filings should be in 22-CV-6648 alone. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 9/15/22) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:22-cv-06648-JMF, 1:22-cv-06793-JMF, 1:22-cv-06799-JMF, 1:22-cv-06818-JMF, 1:22-cv-06893-JMF (yv)
September 15, 2022 CONSOLIDATED MEMBER CASE: Create association to 1:22-cv-06648-JMF. (yv)
September 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: On August 4, 2022, Plaintiff Shiva Stein filed a complaint in 22-CV-6648. Thereafter, four similar complaints were filed in 22-CV-6793, 22-CV-6799, 22-CV-6818, and 22-CV-6893. As of this Order, no motion for consolidation has been filed, but the four later cases were accepted by the Court as related to 22-CV-6648. As the cases appear to involve common questions of law and fact, the Court is inclined to consolidate the cases pursuant to Rule 42 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for all purposes. Any party who objects to such consolidation shall file a letter brief, not to exceed three single-spaced pages, by September 13, 2022. If no party files a letter opposing consolidation, the Court will consolidate the five cases without further notice to the parties. Unless and until the Court orders otherwise, any deadlines and conference dates remain in effect. If any party believes that the dates, deadlines, or procedures should be modified, it shall file a letter motion to that effect by September 13, 2022. It is further ORDERED that the plaintiffs shall promptly serve a copy of this Order on each of the defendants and file proof of service on the docket. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 9/6/2022) (rro)
August 12, 2022 Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (laq)
August 12, 2022 NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Jesse M. Furman. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (laq)
August 12, 2022 CASE ACCEPTED AS RELATED. Create association to 1:22-cv-06648-JMF. Notice of Assignment to follow. (laq)
August 11, 2022 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Unassigned. .(jgo)
August 11, 2022 Case Designated ECF. (jgo)
August 11, 2022 CASE REFERRED TO Judge Jesse M. Furman as possibly related to 22cv6648. (jgo)
August 10, 2022 Filing 3 STATEMENT OF RELATEDNESS re: that this action be filed as related to 1:22-cv-06648. Document filed by Jordan Wilson..(Acocelli, Richard)
August 10, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Acocelli, Richard)
August 10, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AutoWeb, Inc., Michael J. Fuchs, Mark N. Kaplan, Jared R. Rowe, Janet M. Thompson, Jose Vargas, Matias de Tezanos. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26532140)Document filed by Jordan Wilson..(Acocelli, Richard)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wilson v. AutoWeb, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jordan Wilson
Represented By: Richard Adam Acocelli, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AutoWeb, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Fuchs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matias de Tezanos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark N. Kaplan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jared R. Rowe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Janet M. Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jose Vargas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?