Grass Law Group, PLLC v. Yorke
| Grass Law Group, PLLC |
| Bryan W. Yorke |
| 1:2022cv06912 |
| August 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| J Paul Oetken |
| Other Statutes: Arbitration |
| 09 U.S.C. ยง 1 U.S. Arbitration Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Bryan W. Yorke..(jgo) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge J. Paul Oetken. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo) |
| Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo) |
| Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Victoria Elisabeth Brieant. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Dollar Demand $29,184,000;. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Dollar Demand has been modified to $29,000;. (jgo) |
| Filing 5 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Grass Law Group, PLLC..(Brieant, Victoria) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Confirm Arbitration PETITIONER'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF ITS VERIFIED PETITION FOR AN ORDER CONFIRMING AWARD OF ARBITRATION AND DIRECTING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. Document filed by Grass Law Group, PLLC..(Brieant, Victoria) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Bryan W. Yorke, re: #1 Petition to Compel/Confirm/Modify/Stay/Vacate Arbitration. Document filed by Grass Law Group, PLLC..(Brieant, Victoria) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Brieant, Victoria) |
| Filing 1 PETITION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26544694).Document filed by Grass Law Group, PLLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, Engagement Letter, #2 Exhibit 2, Award of Arbitration).(Brieant, Victoria) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Grass Law Group, PLLC v. Yorke | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Grass Law Group, PLLC | |
| Represented By: | Victoria Elisabeth Brieant |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Bryan W. Yorke | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
