Basurto et al v. Lenox Coffee LLC et al
| Margarito Basurto |
| Lenox Coffee LLC doing business as Lenox Coffee Roaster, Rosa Prado, Monica Prado and Arturo Viramontes |
| 1:2022cv06915 |
| August 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| James L Cott |
| Paul G Gardephe |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 26 CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF DEFAULT as to LENOX COFFEE LLC (D/B/A LENOX COFFEE ROASTER). (tp) |
| Filing 25 PROPOSED CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF DEFAULT. Document filed by Margarito Basurto(individually), Margarito Basurto(on behalf of others similarly situated)..(Ansari, Ramsha) Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers). |
| Filing 24 CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF DEFAULT as to ARTUTO VIRAMONTES. (tp) |
| Filing 23 CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF DEFAULT as to ROSA PRADO. (tp) |
| Filing 22 CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF DEFAULT as to MONICA PRADO. (tp) |
| Filing 21 AFFIRMATION of Ramsha Ansari re: #17 Proposed Clerk's Certificate of Default, #20 Proposed Clerk's Certificate of Default, #18 Proposed Clerk's Certificate of Default, #19 Proposed Clerk's Certificate of Default, . Document filed by Margarito Basurto(individually), Margarito Basurto(on behalf of others similarly situated)..(Ansari, Ramsha) |
| Filing 20 PROPOSED CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF DEFAULT. Document filed by Margarito Basurto(individually), Margarito Basurto(on behalf of others similarly situated)..(Ansari, Ramsha) Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers). |
| Filing 19 PROPOSED CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF DEFAULT. Document filed by Margarito Basurto(individually), Margarito Basurto(on behalf of others similarly situated)..(Ansari, Ramsha) Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers). |
| Filing 18 PROPOSED CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF DEFAULT. Document filed by Margarito Basurto(individually), Margarito Basurto(on behalf of others similarly situated)..(Ansari, Ramsha) Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers). |
| Filing 17 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - PROPOSED CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF DEFAULT. Document filed by Margarito Basurto(individually), Margarito Basurto(on behalf of others similarly situated)..(Ansari, Ramsha) Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers). Modified on 9/23/2022 (tp). |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PROPOSED CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF DEFAULT: Notice to Attorney Ramsha Ansari. RE-FILE Document No. #17 Proposed Clerk's Certificate of Default. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the proposed clerk's certificate of default lists the wrong filed date for the proof of service. Re-file the document using the event type Proposed Clerk's Certificate of Default found under the event list Proposed Orders - select the correct filer/filers - attach the correct PDF that - lists the correct filed date of the complaint, lists the correct name(s) of the party(ies) who was/were served, lists the correct date the party(ies) was/were served, lists the correct filed date of the proof of service. (tp) |
| Filing 16 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Monica Prado served on 8/25/2022, answer due 9/15/2022. Service was accepted by Kristina G., Authorized Agent, a person of suitable age and discretion.. Document filed by Margarito Basurto(individually); Margarito Basurto(on behalf of others similarly situated)..(Sojo, Catalina) |
| Filing 15 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Rosa Prado served on 8/25/2022, answer due 9/15/2022. Service was accepted by Kristina G., Authorized Agent, a person of suitable age and discretion.. Document filed by Margarito Basurto(individually); Margarito Basurto(on behalf of others similarly situated)..(Sojo, Catalina) |
| Filing 14 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Arturo Viramontes served on 8/25/2022, answer due 9/15/2022. Service was accepted by Kristina G., Authorized Agent, a person of suitable age and discretion.. Document filed by Margarito Basurto(individually); Margarito Basurto(on behalf of others similarly situated)..(Sojo, Catalina) |
| Filing 13 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Lenox Coffee LLC served on 8/22/2022, answer due 9/12/2022. Service was accepted by Colleen Banahan, Authorized Agent In the Office of the Secretary of State, of the State of New York. Document filed by Margarito Basurto(individually); Margarito Basurto(on behalf of others similarly situated)..(Sojo, Catalina) |
| Filing 12 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Arturo Viramontes..(pc) |
Filing 11
ORDER OF REFERENCE TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for General Pretrial (includes scheduling, discovery, non-dispositive pretrial motions, and settlement). Referred to Magistrate Judge James L. Cott. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 8/17/2022) (ks)
|
| Filing 10 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Arturo Viramontes, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Margarito Basurto(individually), Margarito Basurto(on behalf of others similarly situated)..(Sojo, Catalina) |
| Filing 9 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Monica Prado. (sj) |
| Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Rosa Prado. (sj) |
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Lenox Coffee LLC. (sj) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Paul G. Gardephe. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(sj) |
| Magistrate Judge James L. Cott is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sj) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sj) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Ramsha Ansari on behalf of Margarito Basurto(individually), Margarito Basurto(on behalf of others similarly situated)..(Ansari, Ramsha) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Monica Prado, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Margarito Basurto(individually), Margarito Basurto(on behalf of others similarly situated)..(Sojo, Catalina) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Rosa Prado, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Margarito Basurto(individually), Margarito Basurto(on behalf of others similarly situated)..(Sojo, Catalina) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Lenox Coffee LLC, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Margarito Basurto(individually), Margarito Basurto(on behalf of others similarly situated)..(Sojo, Catalina) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Sojo, Catalina) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Lenox Coffee LLC, Monica Prado, Rosa Prado, Arturo Viramontes. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26545714)Document filed by Margarito Basurto(individually), Margarito Basurto(on behalf of others similarly situated)..(Sojo, Catalina) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
