Mortimer v. Grodsky et al
| Kim Mortimer |
| Bill Wilson, William Horneff, Scott Grodsky, 2386 Hempstead Incorporated, James Kocoris, Esq., Moberg and Kocoris P.C., General Abstract & Settlement Services, Jay Waldhauser, Robert Windfield, ASAP Consulting, Anatasia Koulouris, Tri Costal Abstract, Intercostal Abstract Company, Intra Coastal Abstract, William E. Wilson, Van Horneff, Zeichner Ellman & Krause LLP, Mark Schlussel, Aliya Nelson Esq., City of New York, NYPD John/Jane Doe Officers 1-10 and Jane Doe 1-15 |
| 1:2022cv06926 |
| August 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Lewis J Liman |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Personal Injury |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Received returned mail re: #3 Order 30 Days Amended Complaint (case opening). Mail was addressed to Kim Mortimer, 60 West 91st Street, Apt. A, New York, NY 10024 and was returned for the following reason(s): FWD. (vn) |
| MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 3. Mailed to: Kim Mortimer 60 West 91st Street Apt. A New York, NY 10024. (kh) |
Filing 3
ORDER OF DISMISSAL....The Court dismisses the complaint for failure to state a claim on which relief may begranted.Plaintiff is granted 30 days' leave to file an amended complaint that complies with the standards set forth above. Plaintiff must submit the amended complaint to this Court's Pro Se Intake Unit within sixty days of the date of this order, caption the document as an "Amended Complaint," and label the document with docket number 22-CV-6926 (LJL). An Amended Complaint form is attached to this order. No summons will issue at this time. If Plaintiff fails to comply within the time allowed, and she cannot show good cause to excuse such failure, the Court will direct the Clerk of Court to enter judgment consistent with this order. The Clerk of Court is instructed to hold this matter open on the docket until a judgment is entered. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 9/6/22) (yv)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 2386 Hempstead Incorporated, ASAP Consulting, Aliya Nelson Esq., City of New York, General Abstract & Settlement Services, Scott Grodsky, William Horneff, Intercostal Abstract Company, Intra Coastal Abstract, Jane Doe 1-15, James Kocoris, Esq, Anatasia Koulouris, Moberg and Kocoris P.C., NYPD John/Jane Doe Officers 1-10, Mark Schlussel, Tri Costal Abstract, Jay Waldhauser, Bill Wilson, Robert Windfield, Zeichner Ellman & Krause LLP. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number 4351)Document filed by Kim Mortimer..(rdz) |
| Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (rdz) |
| Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
