Hobbs v. Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC et al
Plaintiff: Alexandra Hobbs
Defendant: Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2022cv06944
Filed: August 15, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Edgardo Ramos
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER: granting #11 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #11 FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint. addressed to Judge Edgardo Ramos from Eric B. Sigda dated September 14, 2022. The defendants' request for an extension of time to respond to the Complaint from September 20, 2022, to October 20, 2022 is GRANTED. It is SO ORDERED. Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC answer due 10/20/2022; The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. answer due 10/20/2022. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 9/14/2022) (ama)
September 14, 2022 Filing 11 FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint addressed to Judge Edgardo Ramos from Eric B. Sigda dated September 14, 2022. Document filed by Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.. Return Date set for 10/20/2022 at 05:30 PM..(Sigda, Eric)
September 12, 2022 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #9 MOTION for Robert Stewart Fine to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-26659299. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (sgz)
September 9, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Eric Bruce Sigda on behalf of Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc...(Sigda, Eric)
September 9, 2022 Filing 9 MOTION for Robert Stewart Fine to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-26659299. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order).(Fine, Robert)
September 5, 2022 Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC served on 8/30/2022, answer due 9/20/2022. Service was accepted by Amy Lesch, NYS SOS, Agent. Document filed by Alexandra Hobbs..(Gottlieb, Jeffrey)
August 16, 2022 Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc...(jgo)
August 16, 2022 Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC..(jgo)
August 16, 2022 Case Designated ECF. (jgo)
August 16, 2022 Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo)
August 16, 2022 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Edgardo Ramos. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo)
August 15, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jeffrey Michael Gottlieb on behalf of Alexandra Hobbs..(Gottlieb, Jeffrey)
August 15, 2022 Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(LaBollita, Michael)
August 15, 2022 Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Alexandra Hobbs..(LaBollita, Michael)
August 15, 2022 Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Alexandra Hobbs..(LaBollita, Michael)
August 15, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26550095)Document filed by Alexandra Hobbs..(LaBollita, Michael)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hobbs v. Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alexandra Hobbs
Represented By: Jeffrey Michael Gottlieb
Represented By: Michael A. LaBollita
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC
Represented By: Eric Bruce Sigda
Represented By: Robert S Fine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
Represented By: Eric Bruce Sigda
Represented By: Robert S Fine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?