Li et al v. Mayorkas et al
| Junru Li and Xia Mei Liu |
| Sec. DHS Alejandro Mayorkas, Director Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and Director Ur M. Jaddou |
| 1:2022cv07105 |
| August 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Lorna G Schofield |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL: IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED that this action shall be and hereby is dismissed without prejudice and without costs or attorney's fees to either party pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 9/23/2022) (mml)
|
| Filing 13 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou..(Press, Joshua) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Joshua Samuel Press on behalf of Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou..(Press, Joshua) |
| Filing 11 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Ur M. Jaddou. (sj) |
| Filing 10 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Alejandro Mayorkas..(sj) |
| Filing 9 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Ur M. Jaddou, re: #1 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus. Document filed by Junru Li, Xia Mei Liu..(Rodkin, David) |
| Filing 8 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Alejandro Mayorkas, re: #1 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus. Document filed by Junru Li, Xia Mei Liu..(Rodkin, David) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney David Rodkin to RE-FILE Document No. #6 Request for Issuance of Summons, #7 Request for Issuance of Summons. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Defendant party text error. Defendant party text does not correspond exactly to pleading caption (do not use acronyms). Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (pc) |
| Filing 7 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - SUMMONS REQUEST PDF ERROR - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Ur M. Jaddou, re: #1 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus. Document filed by Junru Li, Xia Mei Liu..(Rodkin, David) Modified on 8/29/2022 (pc). |
| Filing 6 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - SUMMONS REQUEST PDF ERROR - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Alejandro Mayorkas, re: #1 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus. Document filed by Junru Li, Xia Mei Liu..(Rodkin, David) Modified on 8/29/2022 (pc). |
| Filing 5 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT - SUMMONS REQUEST - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Ur M. Jaddou, re: #1 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus. Document filed by Junru Li, Xia Mei Liu..(Rodkin, David) Modified on 8/23/2022 (vf). |
| Filing 4 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT - SUMMONS REQUEST - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Alejandro Mayorkas, re: #1 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus. Document filed by Junru Li, Xia Mei Liu..(Rodkin, David) Modified on 8/23/2022 (vf). |
| Filing 3 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Junru Li, Xia Mei Liu..(Rodkin, David) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Rodkin, David) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney David Rodkin to RE-FILE Document No. #5 Request for Issuance of Summons, #4 Request for Issuance of Summons. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Defendant party text error. Defendant party text does not correspond exactly to pleading caption. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO ELECTRONICALLY FILE CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to Attorney David Rodkin. Attorney must electronically file the Civil Cover Sheet. Use the event type Civil Cover Sheet found under the event list Other Documents. (vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney David Rodkin. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted; party name entered incorrectly. (vf) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Lorna G. Schofield. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
| Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
| Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS against Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26572592).Document filed by Xia Mei Liu, Junru Li..(Rodkin, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
