Richardson v. Adobe, Inc.
| Douglas G. Richardson |
| Adobe, Inc. |
| 1:2022cv07114 |
| August 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Paul G Gardephe |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 LETTER MOTION for Conference re Adobe's Proposed Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint addressed to Judge Paul G. Gardephe from Jonathan Swisher dated 10-17-2022. Document filed by Adobe, Inc...(Swisher, Jonathan) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jonathan Swisher on behalf of Adobe, Inc...(Swisher, Jonathan) |
Filing 11
JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT ADOBE, INC. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, in accordance with the Court's Individual Rule I.D., that the deadline by which Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint is extended to October 20, 2022. SO ORDERED. Adobe, Inc. answer due 10/20/2022. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 9/15/2022) (kv)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Michael Jonathan Sebba on behalf of Adobe, Inc...(Sebba, Michael) |
| Filing 9 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by Adobe, Inc...(Sebba, Michael) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint,,. Adobe, Inc. served on 8/30/2022, answer due 9/20/2022. Service was accepted by John Conlon-Facility Manager, Adobe, Inc.. Document filed by Douglas G. Richardson..(Sack, Alan) |
|
Filing 7
NOTICE OF PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Initial Conference set for 11/3/2022 at 10:45 AM in Courtroom 705, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Paul G. Gardephe. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 8/23/2022) (ks)
|
| Filing 6 AO 120 FORM PATENT - CASE OPENING - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 290, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a court action has been filed on the following patent(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)..(sj) |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Adobe, Inc.. (sj) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Alan Martin Sack. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Cause of Action code 18:1341; Fee Status code due (due). The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Cause of Action code has been modified to 35:0271; the Fee Status code has been modified to pd (paid). (sj) |
| Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sj) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Paul G. Gardephe. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(sj) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sj) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Adobe, Inc., re: #1 Complaint,,. Document filed by Douglas G. Richardson..(Sack, Alan) |
| Filing 3 AO 120 FORM PATENT - NOTICE OF SUBMISSION BY ATTORNEY. AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark for case opening submitted to court for review..(Sack, Alan) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Sack, Alan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Adobe, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26573976)Document filed by Douglas G. Richardson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1-US7388587, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2-Richardson Adobe 587 IC.Induced, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3-US7629977, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 4-Richardson Adobe 977 IC.Induced, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 5-US8035644, #6 Exhibit Exhibit 6-Richardson Adobe 644 IC.Induced_Direct, #7 Exhibit Exhibit 7-US11232768, #8 Exhibit Exhibit 8-Richardson Adobe 768 IC.Induced, #9 Exhibit Exhibit 9-US11263998, #10 Exhibit Exhibit 10-Richardson Adobe 998 IC.Direct_Induced).(Sack, Alan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Richardson v. Adobe, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Douglas G. Richardson | |
| Represented By: | Alan Martin Sack |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Adobe, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Jonathan Swisher |
| Represented By: | Michael Jonathan Sebba |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
