Zhang v. Garland et al
| Xiao Bing Zhang |
| US Attorney General Merrick Garland, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Director Ur M. Jaddou, Director Kirt Thompson, Director Susan Quintana, Director Christopher Wray, U.S Attorney General Merrick Garland and Susan Quintana |
| 1:2022cv07147 |
| August 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Lorna G Schofield |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL: IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties, that this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs or fees to any party pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 10/17/2022) (mml)
|
| Filing 5 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by Merrick Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Susan Quintana, Kirt Thompson, Christopher Wray..(Roman, Jacqueline) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: WHEREAS on August 22, 2022, the Complaint for a Writ of Mandamus was filed. It is hereby ORDERED that the Government shall, by October 25, 2022, file a memorandum in opposition to the request for a writ of mandamus. The memorandum shall not exceed fifteen pages. Plaintiff shall, by November 10, 2022, file a reply memorandum that shall not exceed ten pages. The memoranda and other materials shall otherwise comply with the Court's Individual Rules., ( Responses due by 10/25/2022, Replies due by 11/10/2022.) (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 9/27/2022) (ama)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jacqueline Roman on behalf of Merrick Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Susan Quintana, Kirt Thompson, Christopher Wray..(Roman, Jacqueline) |
| Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
| Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Aileen Shao. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Merrick Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Susan Quintana, Kirt Thompson, Christopher Wray. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted. (vf) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Lorna G. Schofield. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Shao, Aileen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS against Merrick Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Susan Quintana, Kirt Thompson, Christopher Wray (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26577765).Document filed by Xiao Bing Zhang. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Supporting Documents).(Shao, Aileen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
