Young v. FU Qiumeng Fine Art, LLC
| Lawrence Young |
| FU Qiumeng Fine Art, LLC |
| 1:2022cv07297 |
| August 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Katherine Polk Failla |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #10 FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer addressed to Judge Katherine Polk Failla from Dan Yao dated 10/3/2022., #5 Complaint. Application GRANTED. Defendant shall respond to the Complaint on or before November 19, 2022. The Clerk of Court directed to terminate the pending motion at docket number 10. SO ORDERED. FU Qiumeng Fine Art, LLC answer due 11/19/2022. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 10/4/2022) (tg)
|
| Filing 10 FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer addressed to Judge Katherine Polk Failla from Dan Yao dated 10/3/2022. Document filed by FU Qiumeng Fine Art, LLC..(Yao, Dan) |
| Filing 9 FIRST RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by FU Qiumeng Fine Art, LLC..(Yao, Dan) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Dan Yao on behalf of FU Qiumeng Fine Art, LLC..(Yao, Dan) |
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE. FU Qiumeng Fine Art, LLC served on 9/14/2022, answer due 10/5/2022. Service was accepted by Sue Zouky, legal clerk. Document filed by Lawrence Young..(Marks, Bradly) |
|
Filing 6
NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: This case has been assigned to me for all purposes. It is hereby ORDERED that counsel for all parties appear for an initial pretrial conference with the Court on November 17, 2022, at 12:00 p.m. The conference will be held telephonically. At the scheduled date and time, the parties are to call (888) 363-4749 and enter access code 5123533. Initial Conference set for 11/17/2022 at 12:00 PM before Judge Katherine Polk Failla. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 9/15/2022) (rro)
|
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT against FU Qiumeng Fine Art, LLC. Document filed by Lawrence Young..(Marks, Bradly) |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to FU Qiumeng Fine Art, LLC..(pc) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Bradly G. Marks to RE-FILE Document No. #1 Complaint,. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the wrong filer/filers were selected for the pleading;. Re-file the pleading using the event type Complaint found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. (pc) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Katherine Polk Failla. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc) |
| Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
| Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Bradly G. Marks. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Lawrence Young. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was entered in all caps;. (pc) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to FU Qiumeng Fine Art, LLC, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by FU Qiumeng Fine Art, LLC..(Marks, Bradly) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Marks, Bradly) |
| Filing 1 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - FILER ERROR - COMPLAINT against FU Qiumeng Fine Art, LLC. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26599935)Document filed by FU Qiumeng Fine Art, LLC..(Marks, Bradly) Modified on 8/29/2022 (pc). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Young v. FU Qiumeng Fine Art, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lawrence Young | |
| Represented By: | Bradly G. Marks |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: FU Qiumeng Fine Art, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Bradly G. Marks |
| Represented By: | Dan Yao |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
