Doncouse v. Coffee RX Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Graciela Doncouse
Defendant: Coffee RX Inc. and Washington Square Realty Corp.
Case Number: 1:2022cv07298
Filed: August 26, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Edgardo Ramos
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 27, 2022 Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE. Service was accepted by Sue Zouky, legal clerk. Document filed by Graciela Doncouse..(Marks, Bradly)
September 16, 2022 Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. Washington Square Realty Corp. waiver sent on 9/14/2022, answer due 11/14/2022. Document filed by Graciela Doncouse..(Marks, Bradly)
September 16, 2022 Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. Coffee RX Inc. waiver sent on 9/14/2022, answer due 11/14/2022. Document filed by Graciela Doncouse..(Marks, Bradly)
August 29, 2022 Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Coffee RX Inc., Washington Square Realty Corp...(pc)
August 29, 2022 Case Designated ECF. (pc)
August 29, 2022 Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc)
August 29, 2022 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Edgardo Ramos. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc)
August 26, 2022 Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to COFFEE RX INC. AND WASHINGTON SQUARE REALTY CORP., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Graciela Doncouse..(Marks, Bradly)
August 26, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Marks, Bradly)
August 26, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Coffee RX Inc., Washington Square Realty Corp.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26599984)Document filed by Graciela Doncouse..(Marks, Bradly)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Doncouse v. Coffee RX Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Graciela Doncouse
Represented By: Bradly G. Marks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Coffee RX Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Washington Square Realty Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?