Go City Inc. et al v. City Pass, Inc.
Go City Inc., Go City North America, LLC and Go City Limited |
City Pass, Inc. |
1:2022cv07408 |
August 30, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Lewis A Kaplan |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) City Pass, Inc.. Document filed by Go City Inc., Go City Limited, Go City North America, LLC. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Weisbein, Robert) |
Filing 12 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint,. City Pass, Inc. served on 9/15/2022, answer due 10/6/2022. Service was accepted by Sharon Munford, Manager. Document filed by Go City Inc.; Go City Limited; Go City North America, LLC..(Weisbein, Robert) |
Filing 11 ORDER GRANTING ADMISSION OF KELSEY BOEHM PRO HAC VICE granting #10 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The motion of Kelsey Boehm for admission to practice pro hac vice in the above captioned action is granted. As further set forth by this Order. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 9/29/2022) (tg) |
>>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #10 MOTION for Kelsey C. Boehm to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-26732754. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (sgz) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Kelsey C. Boehm to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-26732754. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Go City Inc., Go City Limited, Go City North America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Kelsey Boehm (with Certificates of Good Standing Annexed), #2 Text of Proposed Order for Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice).(Boehm, Kelsey) |
Filing 9 AO 120 FORM TRADEMARK - CASE OPENING - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 15 U.S.C. 1116, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a court action has been filed on the following trademark(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). (vf) |
Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to City Pass, Inc.. (vf) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT TRADEMARK FORM. Notice to Attorney Robert S. Weisbein re: Document No. #2 AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark - Notice of Submission by Attorney. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the Docket Number and Date Filed field on the AO 120 Patent/Trademark form was not completed by the attorney. Do not re-file the form. The Court has corrected the deficiency/deficiencies. (vf) |
Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Robert S. Weisbein. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Cause of Action code 15:44 Trademark Infringement; County code New York. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Cause of Action code has been modified to 15:1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act); the County code has been modified to XX Out of U.S. (vf) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Lewis A. Kaplan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
Filing 7 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Go City North America, LLC..(Weisbein, Robert) |
Filing 6 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Go City Limited..(Weisbein, Robert) |
Filing 5 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Go City Inc...(Weisbein, Robert) |
Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to City Pass, Inc., re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Go City Inc., Go City Limited, Go City North America, LLC..(Weisbein, Robert) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Weisbein, Robert) |
Filing 2 AO 120 FORM TRADEMARK - NOTICE OF SUBMISSION BY ATTORNEY. AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark for case opening submitted to court for review..(Weisbein, Robert) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City Pass, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26612803)Document filed by Go City Inc., Go City Limited, Go City North America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3).(Weisbein, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.