Carrasco v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Rickent S Carrasco |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| Social Security Administration |
| 1:2022cv07452 |
| August 31, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Jennifer E Willis |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
SCHEDULING ORDER: The above-referenced social security action has been assigned to Magistrate Judge Willis. This Order supersedes all prior scheduling orders in this matter. All motions and applications, including those related to scheduling, and all motions to dismiss or for judgment on the pleadings, must be made to Judge Willis and in compliance with this Court's Individual Practices in Civil Cases, available on the Court's website at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-jennifer-e-willis. In order to promote the efficient adjudication of this matter, Judge Willis expects the parties to adhere to the following schedule and comply with the following procedures: As further set forth by this Order. Counsel for the Plaintiff must serve this Order on the Defendant and must file proof ofsuch service with the Court. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer E Willis on 10/14/2022) (tg)
|
| Filing 12 CONSENT TO JURISDICTION BY A US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Rickent S Carrasco, Commissioner of Social Security. (Case No Longer Referred to Magistrate Judge) CASE ASSIGNED to Magistrate Judge Jennifer E Willis. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 10/13/2022) (mml) |
| Filing 11 PROPOSED CONSENT TO JURISDICTION BY US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Commissioner of Social Security. Document filed by Commissioner of Social Security..(Hurd, Christopher) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER OF REFERENCE TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE. It is hereby ORDERED that this case is referred to the for a report and recommendation on any motion for judgment on the pleadings. To conserve resources, to promote judicial efficiency, and in an effort to achieve a faster disposition of this matter, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties must discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 9/23/22) (yv)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Christopher N Hurd on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security..(Hurd, Christopher) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Commissioner of Social Security served on 9/19/2022, answer due 10/11/2022. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Rickent S Carrasco. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Delivery Receipt).(Berger, Daniel) |
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Commissioner of Social Security..(jgo) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION: Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees is authorized. 28 U.S.C. 1915. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 9/2/2022) (kv)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING ORDER IN RE MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (See 16-MISC-171 Standing Order filed April 28, 2016). ORDERED that in all Social Security cases hereafter filed under 42 U.S.C. 405(g) and 42 U.S.C. 1383(c)(3), the defendant shall within 90 days after service file the certified transcript of administrative proceedings, which shall constitute the defendants' answer, or otherwise move against the complaint... that unless otherwise ordered by the judge to whom the case is assigned, in cases where the plaintiff is represented by counsel, the plaintiff shall file a motion for judgment on the pleadings within 60 days of the date on which the defendant files the certified transcript of the administrative proceedings... that in cases where the plaintiff is appearing pro se, the defendant shall file its motion for judgment on the pleadings within 60 days of the date on which the certified transcript of administrative proceedings have been filed... (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 4/20/2016) (jgo)
|
| Magistrate Judge Jennifer Willis is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Lorna G. Schofield. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo) |
| Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Commissioner of Social Security, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Rickent S Carrasco..(Berger, Daniel) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Rickent S Carrasco..(Berger, Daniel) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Berger, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security. Document filed by Rickent S Carrasco. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Appeal Council Denial Letter).(Berger, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
