Rimini v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. et al
Plaintiff: Thomas Rimini
Defendant: J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Securities, LLC, JPMorgan Chase Bank and Bear Stearns
Case Number: 1:2022cv07768
Filed: September 9, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: John P Cronan
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER After reviewing Plaintiff's claims in light of the above factors and particularly in light of the fact that Plaintiff is himself an attorney, see Dkt. 1 at 30, the Court denies without prejudice Plaintiffs request for counsel, which he may renew at such time as the existence of a potentially meritorious claim may be demonstrated. The Court notes that Plaintiff may always contact the New York Legal Assistance Group (NYLAG), which provides free legal assistance to pro se litigants, and which may be reached through https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/attorney/legal-assistance. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 11/7/2022) (jca)
November 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE FOR STEVEN J. PEARLMAN granting #14 MOTION for Steven J. Pearlman to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The motion of Steven J. Pearlman for admission to practice Pro Hac Vice in the above-captioned action is granted. (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 11/7/2022) (jca)
November 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MOTION FOR SUBPOENA OR PAUSE. Document filed by Thomas Rimini.(sc)
November 4, 2022 Opinion or Order >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #14 MOTION for Steven J. Pearlman to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (sac)
November 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MOTION for Steven J. Pearlman to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Chase Bank, JPMorgan Securities, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Steven J. Pearlman, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order).(Pearlman, Steven)
November 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: #10 Letter filed by J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Securities, LLC, JPMorgan Chase Bank. ENDORSEMENT: Since Plaintiff's responsive pre-motion letter did not propose an alternative briefing schedule or object to Defendants' proposed briefing schedule, the Court will adopt it. Defendants shall file their motion to dismiss by November 9, 2022; Plaintiff shall file his opposition by November 23, 2022; and Defendants shall file their reply by December 5, 2022. SO ORDERED. ( Motions due by 11/9/2022., Responses due by 11/23/2022, Replies due by 12/5/2022.) (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 11/3/2022) (vfr)
November 3, 2022 Opinion or Order >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice to RE-FILE Document No. #7 MOTION for Steven J. Pearlman to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-26907293. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): missing Proposed Order;. Re-file the motion as a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice - attach the correct signed PDF - select the correct named filer/filers - attach valid Certificates of Good Standing issued within the past 30 days - attach Proposed Order. (sac)
November 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 LETTER addressed to Judge John P. Cronan from T. Rimini, dated 11/2/22 re: "Copy of Email to Judge Cronan for ECF" - I ask that the defendants' request be denied. Defendants' time to answer the Complaint has passed. FRCP-12. I served copies of the Summons & Complaint including to P. Kramer Rice attorney of record for this matter on 10/7/22. Attachment. I also served the defendants with the Summons & Complaint including through its registered agent etc. I ask that the Court consider appointing me an attorney to represent me in this matter. Document filed by Thomas Rimini.(sc)
November 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Other Affiliate The Vanguard Group, Inc. for J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Chase Bank, JPMorgan Securities, LLC. Document filed by J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Chase Bank, JPMorgan Securities, LLC..(Rice, Patrick)
November 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 LETTER addressed to Judge John P. Cronan from P. Kramer Rice dated November 2, 2022 re: Pre-Motion Letter to Court - Motion to Dismiss. Document filed by J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Chase Bank, JPMorgan Securities, LLC..(Rice, Patrick)
November 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 FILING ERROR - CORPORATE PARENT/OTHER AFFILIATE NOT ADDED - RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Chase Bank, JPMorgan Securities, LLC..(Rice, Patrick) Modified on 11/2/2022 (lb).
November 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Patrick Kramer Rice on behalf of J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Chase Bank, JPMorgan Securities, LLC..(Rice, Patrick)
November 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION for Steven J. Pearlman to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-26907293. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Chase Bank, JPMorgan Securities, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Steven J. Pearlman, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing).(Pearlman, Steven)
November 2, 2022 Opinion or Order ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Notice to Attorney Patrick Kramer Rice to RE-FILE Document No. #9 Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement,. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the corporate parent/other affiliate was not added;. Re-file the document using the event type Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement found under the event list Other Documents - select the correct filer/filers - attach the correct signed PDF - when prompted with the message "Are there any corporate parents or other affiliates?", select the Yes radio button - enter the corporate parent/other affiliate, click the Search button - select the correct corporate parent/other affiliate name from the search results list or if no person found, create a new corporate parent/other affiliate - select the party to whom the corporate parent/other affiliate should be linked - add corporate parent/other affiliate names one at a time. (lb)
October 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 INFORMATION PACKAGE MAILED to Thomas Rimini, at 48 Waterfield Rd., Box 391, Winchester, MA 01890, on 10/4/2022 Re: #4 Order of Service. The following document(s) were enclosed in the Service Package: a copy of the order of service or order to answer and other orders entered to date, the individual practices of the district judge and magistrate judge assigned to your case, Instructions for Litigants Who Do Not Have Attorneys, Notice Regarding Privacy and Public Access to Electronic Case Files, a Motions guide, a notice that the Pro Se Manual has been discontinued, a Notice of Change of Address form to use if your contact information changes, a handout explaining matters handled by magistrate judges and consent form to complete if all parties agree to proceed for all purposes before the magistrate judge, one or more summonses (only if you have paid the fee in person or if the judge has ordered that a summons be issued to you) - 4 Summons(es) mailed. (sha)
October 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to J.P. Chase & Co., J.P. Morgan Securities, LLC, J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, Bear Stearns. (sha)
October 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER OF SERVICE: Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, paid the filing fees to commence this action. The Clerk of Court is directed to issue summonses as to Defendants J.P. Chase & Co.; J.P. Morgan Securities, LLC, J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, and Bear Stearns. Plaintiff is directed to serve the summons and complaint on each defendant within 90 days of the issuance of the summonses. If within those 90 days, Plaintiff has not either served Defendants or requested an extension of time to do so, the Court may dismiss the claims against Defendants under Rules 4 and 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to prosecute. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 10/04/2022) (ama) Transmission to Pro Se Assistants for processing.
October 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Magistrate Judge James L. Cott is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vba)
October 3, 2022 Opinion or Order NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge John P. Cronan. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (vba)
September 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Pro Se Payment of Fee Processed: $402.00 Check processed by the Finance Department on 09/26/2022, Receipt Number 6301. (stt)
September 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Bear Stearns, J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Chase Bank, JPMorgan Securities, LLC., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Thomas Rimini. (sac)
September 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bear Stearns, J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Chase Bank, JPMorgan Securities, LLC. Document filed by Thomas Rimini. (sac)
September 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Case Designated ECF. (sac)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rimini v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thomas Rimini
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.
Represented By: Patrick Kramer Rice
Represented By: Steven J Pearlman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JPMorgan Securities, LLC
Represented By: Patrick Kramer Rice
Represented By: Steven J Pearlman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JPMorgan Chase Bank
Represented By: Patrick Kramer Rice
Represented By: Steven J Pearlman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bear Stearns
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?