Muzumala v. Unknown Federal Agents et al
| Joshua Muzumala |
| Unknown Federal Agents, John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3, John Doe 4, John Doe 5, John Doe 6, Jane Doe 1, University of New Orleans, Neal Maroney and Susan Brady |
| 1:2022cv07851 |
| September 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1932 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 DECLARATION of Joshua Mazumala in Support of re: #4 Notice (Other). Document filed by Joshua Muzumala. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(sc) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE Of MOTION, Re: for case to proceed onward. Document filed by Joshua Muzumala. (sc) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE CONSENT TO RECEIVE ELECTRONIC SERVICE. The following party: Joshua Muzumala consents to receive electronic service via the ECF system. Document filed by Joshua Muzumala. (sac) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Susan Brady, Jane Doe 1, John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3, John Doe 4, John Doe 5, John Doe 6, Neal Maroney, University of New Orleans, Unknown Federal Agents. Document filed by Joshua Muzumala. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2) (sac) |
| Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Joshua Muzumala. (sac) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
