Gooden v. City Carting, Inc. et al
Ms. Veta Gooden and Veta Gooden |
City Carting, Inc., Mr. Christopher Mendoza and Christopher Mendoza |
1:2022cv07978 |
September 19, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Naomi Reice Buchwald |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. City Carting, Inc. served on 10/5/2022, answer due 10/26/2022. Service was accepted by Nancy Dogherty, Authorized Agent. Document filed by Veta Gooden..(Harris, Steven) |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to City Carting, Inc., Christopher Mendoza..(pc) |
Filing 5 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Harris, Steven) |
Filing 4 COMPLAINT against City Carting, Inc., Christopher Mendoza. Document filed by Veta Gooden..(Harris, Steven) |
Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Steven R Harris to RE-FILE Document No. #1 Complaint. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the pleading was not signed by the filing attorney. Re-file the pleading using the event type Complaint found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. (pc) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to attorney Steven R Harris to RE-FILE Document No. #2 Civil Cover Sheet. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): multiple citizenships for the defendant was selected. Choose one for the first listed defendant. (pc) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Steven R Harris. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Fee Status code due (due);. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Fee Status code has been modified to pd (paid);. (pc) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to City Carting, Inc. and Christopher Mendoza, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Veta Gooden..(Harris, Steven) |
Filing 2 FILING ERROR - PDF ERROR - CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Harris, Steven) Modified on 9/20/2022 (pc). |
Filing 1 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - SIGNATURE ERROR COMPLAINT against City Carting, Inc., Christopher Mendoza. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26698710)Document filed by Veta Gooden..(Harris, Steven) Modified on 9/20/2022 (pc). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.