Wolfson v. Signify Health, Inc. et al
| Barbara Wolfson |
| Signify Health, Inc., Matthew S. Holt, Kyle B. Peterson, Brandon H. Hull, Kevin M. McNamara, Albert A. Notini, Arnold Goldberg, Kyle Armbrester, Taj J. Clayton, Vivian E. Riefberg and Heather Dixon |
| Karyn Bruton, Stephen Bushansky, Shoshana Minzer and Phil Lifshitz |
| 1:2022cv08373 |
| September 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Jesse M Furman |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed against the defendant(s) Albert A. Notini, Arnold Goldberg, Brandon H. Hull, Heather Dixon, Kevin M. McNamara, Kyle Armbrester, Kyle B. Peterson, Matthew S. Holt, Signify Health, Inc., Taj J. Clayton, Vivian E. Riefberg.Any pending motions are moot. All conferences are vacated. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 11/9/2022) (tro) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) Albert A. Notini, Arnold Goldberg, Brandon H. Hull, Heather Dixon, Kevin M. McNamara, Kyle Armbrester, Kyle B. Peterson, Matthew S. Holt, Signify Health, Inc., Taj J. Clayton, Vivian E. Riefberg. Document filed by Karyn Bruton. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Smith, Evan) |
Filing 15
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), plaintiff Phil Lifshitz ("Plaintiff") voluntarily dismisses the claims in the captioned action (the "Action"). Because this notice of dismissal is being filed with the Court before service by defendants of either an answer or a motion for summary judgment, Plaintiff's dismissal of the Action is effective upon the filing of this notice. The Clerk of Court is directed to docket this in 22-CV-8373. The Clerk is further directed to terminate Phil Lifshitz as Plaintiff in 22-CV-8373. SO ORDERED., (Phil Lifshitz terminated.) (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 11/3/22) (yv)
|
|
Filing 14
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), plaintiff Stephen Bushansky ("Plaintiff") voluntarily dismisses the claims in the captioned action (the "Action"). Because this notice of dismissal is being filed with the Court before service by defendants of either an answer or a motion for summary judgment, Plaintiff's dismissal of the Action is effective upon the filing of this notice. The Clerk of Court is directed to docket this in 22-CV-8373. The Clerk is further directed to terminate Stephen Bushansky as Plaintiff in 22-CV-8373. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 11/3/2022) Stephen Bushansky terminated. (ks)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL UNDER RULE 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Notice is hereby given that pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff voluntarily dismisses the above-titled action without prejudice. This notice of dismissal is being filed with the Court before service by Defendants of either an answer or a motion for summary judgment. The Clerk of Court is directed to docket this in 22-CV-8373. The Clerk is further directed to terminate Shoshana Minzer as Plaintiff in 22-CV-8373. SO ORDERED., (Shoshana Minzer terminated.) (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 11/3/22) (yv)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), plaintiff Barbara Wolfson ("Plaintiff") voluntarily dismisses the claims in the captioned action (the "Action"). Because this notice of dismissal is being filed with the Court before service by defendants of either an answer or a motion for summary judgment, Plaintiff's dismissal of the Action is effective upon the filing of this notice. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Barbara Wolfson as Plaintiff in 22-CV-8373. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 11/3/2022) Barbara Wolfson terminated. (ks)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice and without costs against the defendant(s) Albert A. Notini, Arnold Goldberg, Brandon H. Hull, Heather Dixon, Kevin M. McNamara, Kyle Armbrester, Kyle B. Peterson, Matthew S. Holt, Signify Health, Inc., Taj J. Clayton, Vivian E. Riefberg. Document filed by Barbara Wolfson. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Engel, Shallom) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL. Notice to Attorney Michael Rogovin. RE-FILE Document No. #8 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, #9 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the individual party/parties whom the voluntary dismissal is against was/were not selected. Re-file the document using the event type Notice of Voluntary Dismissal found under the event list Notices - select the correct individual filer/filers - select the correct individual party/parties the voluntary dismissal is against - and attach the correct signed PDF. (tp) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL. Notice to Attorney Shallom Engel. RE-FILE Document No. #10 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the individual party/parties whom the voluntary dismissal is against was/were not selected. Re-file the document using the event type Notice of Voluntary Dismissal found under the event list Notices - select the correct individual filer/filers - select the correct individual party/parties the voluntary dismissal is against - and attach the correct signed PDF. (tp) |
| Filing 10 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY FILED AGAINST PARTY ERROR - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, against the defendant(s) All Defendants. Document filed by Barbara Wolfson. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Engel, Shallom) Modified on 11/3/2022 (tp). |
| Filing 9 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY FILED AGAINST PARTY ERROR - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, against the defendant(s) All Defendants. Document filed by Phil Lifshitz. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Rogovin, Michael) Modified on 11/3/2022 (tp). |
| Filing 8 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY FILED AGAINST PARTY ERROR - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, against the defendant(s) All Defendants. Document filed by Stephen Bushansky. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Rogovin, Michael) Modified on 11/3/2022 (tp). |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Order served on Defendants on 10/28/2022. Service was made by Email. Document filed by Barbara Wolfson..(Engel, Shallom) |
|
Filing 6
NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Unless and until the Court orders otherwise, counsel for all parties shall appear for an initial pretrial conference with the Court on January 26, 2023, at 10:00 a.m. The conference will be held remotely by telephone in accordance with Paragraph 3.B of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases. The parties should join the conference by calling the Court's dedicated conference line at (888) 363-4749 and using access code 542-1540, followed by the pound (#) key. All counsel must also familiarize themselves with the Court's Individual Rules, which are available at https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-jesse-m-furman. Absent leave of Court obtained by letter-motion filed before the conference, all pretrial conferences must be attended by the attorney who will serve as principal trial counsel. Counsel who have entered a notice of appearance as of the issuance of this order are directed (1) to notify counsel for all other parties in this action who have not yet appeared by serving upon each of them a copy of this order and the Court's Individual Rules and Practices forthwith, and (2) to file proof of such notice with the Court. If unaware of the identity of counsel for any of the parties, counsel receiving this order must forthwith send a copyof this order and the Court's Individual Rules and Practices to that party personally. And as set forth herein. SO ORDERED.Telephonic Initial Conference set for 1/26/2023 at 10:00 AM before Judge Jesse M. Furman. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 10/28/2022) (ama)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: On October 20, 2022, the Court issued an Order stating that these five cases (along with three others that have since been voluntarily dismissed) appeared to involve common questions of law and fact, so it was inclined to consolidate them, but that if any party objected, the party needed to file a letter brief by October 27, 2022. ECF No. 4. Having received no objections, it is hereby ordered that, pursuant to Rule 42(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the cases are consolidated under the case number 22-CV-8373. By separate Order today, this Court will schedule an initial pre-trial conference. It is further ORDERED that the Plaintiff Barbara Wolfson shall promptly serve a copy of this Order on each of the Defendants and file proof of service on the docket. The Clerk of Court is directed to consolidate 22-CV-8373, 22-CV-8425, 22-CV-8527, 22-CV-8540, and 22-CV-8564 under case number 22-CV-8373, and to close 22-CV-8425, 22- CV-8527, 22-CV-8540, and 22-CV-8564. All future filings should be in 22-CV-8373 alone. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 10/28/2022) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:22-cv-08373-JMF, 1:22-cv-08425-JMF, 1:22-cv-08527-JMF, 1:22-cv-08540-JMF, 1:22-cv-08564-JMF (ama)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER: On September 20, 2022, Plaintiff Shiva Stein filed a complaint in 22-CV-8048. Thereafter, seven similar complaints were filed in 22-CV-8074, 22-CV-8373, 22-CV-8425, 22-CV-8527, 22-CV-8540, 22-CV-8564, and 22-CV-8622. As of this Order, no motion for consolidation has been filed, but the seven later cases were accepted by the Court as related to 22-CV-8048. As the cases appear to involve common questions of law and fact, the Court is inclined to consolidate the cases pursuant to Rule 42 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for all purposes. Any party who objects to such consolidation shall file a letter brief, not to exceed three single-spaced pages, by October 27, 2022. If no party files a letter opposing consolidation, the Court will consolidate the eight cases without further notice to the parties. Unless and until the Court orders otherwise, any deadlines and conference dates remain in effect. If any party believes that the dates, deadlines, or procedures should be modified, it shall file a letter motion to that effect by October 27, 2022. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff Shiva Stein shall promptly serve a copy of this Order on all Defendants and file proof of service on the docket. SO ORDERED( Motions due by 10/27/2022.) (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 10/20/2022) (tg)
|
| CASE ACCEPTED AS RELATED. Create association to 1:22-cv-08048-JMF. Notice of Assignment to follow. (laq) |
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Jesse M. Furman. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (laq) |
| Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (laq) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Unassigned. (vf) |
| Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
| CASE REFERRED TO Judge Jesse M. Furman as possibly related to 1:22-cv-08048. (vf) |
| Filing 3 STATEMENT OF RELATEDNESS re: that this action be filed as related to 1:22-cv-08048-JMF. Document filed by Barbara Wolfson..(Engel, Shallom) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Engel, Shallom) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Albert A. Notini, Arnold Goldberg, Brandon H. Hull, Heather Dixon, Kevin M. McNamara, Kyle Armbrester, Kyle B. Peterson, Matthew S. Holt, Signify Health, Inc., Taj J. Clayton, Vivian E. Riefberg. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26758344)Document filed by Barbara Wolfson..(Engel, Shallom) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
