Trivedi v. General Electric Company et al
| Madhuri Trivedi |
| General Electric Company, GE Healthcare, Larry Culp, GE Board of Directors, Michael Swinford, Carl Conrath, John Dineen, David Mehring, Nicole Boyles, Adam Holton, Michael Truman, Ayesha Khan, Jeffrey Immelt, Timothy Kottak, David Elario, Robert Swieringa, Susan Hockfield, Diane Smith, Dipti Patel, Nathan Davis, Gregory Stratton, William Barbiaux, Reema Poddar, Ward Bowman, Michael Harsh, Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen & Loewry LLP, Jenny Schrager, Foley & Mansfield Law Firm, Department of Labor, Martin Walsh, OSHA, Office of the Administration Law Judge, Daniel Koh, Anthony Rosa, Frederick James, Doug Parker, Tamara Simpson, Robert Kuss, Willaim Donovan, Denise Keller, Nathan Terwilliger and William Trepanier |
| 1:2022cv08453 |
| October 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Laura Taylor Swain |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 AMENDED MOTION TO ECF 7 - FILED 10/13/22, Re: for Reconsideration re; #7 MOTION for Reconsideration re; #6 Order on Motion for Reconsideration, Order on Motion to Bifurcate. MOTION to Bifurcate, MOTION to Bifurcate. Document filed by Madhuri Trivedi.(sc) |
Filing 9
ORDER: Plaintiff's request for reconsideration (ECF No. 7) is denied. The Clerk of Court is directed not to accept any further submissions under this docket number except for papers directed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).SO ORDERED. denying #7 Motion for Reconsideration re #7 MOTION for Reconsideration re; #6 Order on Motion for Reconsideration,,,,, Order on Motion to Bifurcate,MOTION to Bifurcate. filed by Madhuri Trivedi ; denying #7 Motion to Bifurcate. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 10/13/22) (rdz) Transmission to Office of the Clerk of Court for processing.
|
| Filing 7 MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION -TRANSFER ORDER - (for Reconsideration re; #6 Order on Motion for Reconsideration, Order on Motion to Bifurcate), MOTION TO BIFURCATE & MOTION FOR RELIEF. Document filed by Madhuri Trivedi.sc) Modified on 10/13/2022 (sc). |
| Received e-mail from the United States District Court - District of Massachusetts acknowledging receipt of transferred case. Assigned Case Number: 1:22-cv-11746, filed on 10/13/2022. (vba) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 5) is denied. This action is closed. The Clerk of Court will only accept for filing documents that are directed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. If Plaintiff files other documents that are frivolous or meritless, the Court will direct Plaintiff to show cause why Plaintiff should not be barred from filing further documents in this action. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED.denying #5 Motion for Reconsideration re #5 MOTION for Reconsideration re; #4 Order,,,. MOTION to Bifurcate. filed by Madhuri Trivedi ; denying #5 Motion to Bifurcate. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 10/12/22) (rdz) Transmission to Office of the Clerk of Court for processing.
|
| Filing 5 MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION - TRANSFER ORDER, re: #4 Order, AND MOTION TO BIFURCATE & MOTION FOR RELIEF. Document filed by Madhuri Trivedi.(sc) |
| CASE TRANSFERRED OUT ELECTRONICALLY from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of New York to the United States District Court - District of District of Massachusetts.(rdz) |
|
Filing 4
TRANSFER ORDER: The Clerk of Court is directed to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. Whether Plaintiff should be permitted to proceed further without prepayment of fees is a determination to be made by the transferee court. A summons shall not issue from this Court. This order closes this case. The Court certifies, under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 10/5/22) (rdz) Transmission to Office of the Clerk of Court for processing.
|
| Filing 3 PRO SE CONSENT TO RECEIVE ELECTRONIC SERVICE. The following party: Madhuri Trivedi consents to receive electronic service via the ECF system. Document filed by Madhuri Trivedi. (ok) |
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (aea) |
| ***DELETED DOCUMENT. Deleted document number #3 ORDER. The document was incorrectly filed in this case. (rdz) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against William Barbiaux, Ward Bowman, Nicole Boyles, Carl Conrath, Larry Culp, Nathan Davis, Department of Labor, John Dineen, David Elario, Foley & Mansfield Law Firm, Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen & Loewry LLP, GE Board of Directors, GE Healthcare, General Electric Company, Michael Harsh, Susan Hockfield, Adam Holton, Jeffrey Immelt, Ayesha Khan, Timothy Kottak, David Mehring, OSHA, Office of the Administration Law Judge, Dipti Patel, Reema Poddar, Jenny Schrager, Diane Smith, Gregory Stratton, Robert Swieringa, Michael Swinford, Michael Truman, Martin Walsh. Document filed by Madhuri Trivedi..(rdz) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET.(rdz) |
| Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
