Ortiz v. Rapid Armored Corporation
Manuel Ortiz |
Rapid Armored Corporation |
1:2022cv08511 |
October 6, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Mary Kay Vyskocil |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice and without costs against the defendant(s) Rapid Armored Corporation. Document filed by Manuel Ortiz. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Lee, C.K.) |
![]() |
Filing 14 LETTER RESPONSE to Motion addressed to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil from C.K. Lee dated December 6, 2022 re: #12 MOTION for Conference Re: Defendant's desire to file a motion to dismiss. . Document filed by Manuel Ortiz..(Lee, C.K.) |
Filing 13 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent Pay-O-Matic Corp. for Rapid Armored Corporation. Document filed by Rapid Armored Corporation..(Kozak, Jonathan) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Notice to Attorney Jonathan Marc Kozak to RE-FILE Document No. #11 Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the corporate parent/other affiliate was not added;. Re-file the document using the event type Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement found under the event list Other Documents - select the correct filer/filers - attach the correct signed PDF - when prompted with the message "Are there any corporate parents or other affiliates?", select the Yes radio button - enter the corporate parent/other affiliate, click the Search button - select the correct corporate parent/other affiliate name from the search results list or if no person found, create a new corporate parent/other affiliate - select the party to whom the corporate parent/other affiliate should be linked - add corporate parent/other affiliate names one at a time. (lb) |
Filing 12 MOTION for Conference Re: Defendant's desire to file a motion to dismiss. Document filed by Rapid Armored Corporation..(Kozak, Jonathan) |
Filing 11 FILING ERROR - CORPORATE PARENT/OTHER AFFILIATE NOT ADDED - RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Rapid Armored Corporation..(Kozak, Jonathan) Modified on 12/2/2022 (lb). |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jonathan Marc Kozak on behalf of Rapid Armored Corporation..(Kozak, Jonathan) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jason Mattar on behalf of Rapid Armored Corporation..(Mattar, Jason) |
![]() |
Filing 7 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by Manuel Ortiz..(Lee, C.K.) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Rapid Armored Corporation served on 10/11/2022, answer due 11/1/2022. Document filed by Manuel Ortiz..(Lee, C.K.) |
Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Rapid Armored Corporation. (vf) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
Filing 4 CONSENT TO SUE UNDER THE F.L.S.A.. Document filed by Manuel Ortiz..(Lee, C.K.) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Rapid Armored Corporation, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Manuel Ortiz..(Lee, C.K.) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Lee, C.K.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Rapid Armored Corporation. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26783022)Document filed by Manuel Ortiz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A).(Lee, C.K.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ortiz v. Rapid Armored Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Manuel Ortiz | |
Represented By: | C.K. Lee |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Rapid Armored Corporation | |
Represented By: | Jonathan Marc Kozak |
Represented By: | Jason Mattar |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.