DARR Lazers, LLC v. Pro-Line Solutions, Inc.
Plaintiff: DARR Lazers, LLC
Defendant: Pro-Line Solutions, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2022cv08597
Filed: October 10, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Jed S Rakoff
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Both
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 18, 2022 Filing 14 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with JURY DEMAND., COUNTERCLAIM against DARR Lazers, LLC. Document filed by Pro-Line Solutions, Inc...(Kapasi, Anand)
November 18, 2022 Filing 13 FIRST RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Pro-Line Solutions, Inc...(Kapasi, Anand)
November 18, 2022 Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Benjamin Jarret Wolf on behalf of Pro-Line Solutions, Inc...(Wolf, Benjamin)
November 9, 2022 Filing 11 CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN: This case is to be tried to a jury. Amended Pleadings due by 1/9/2023. Joinder of Parties due by 1/9/2023. Motions due by 3/24/2023. Responses due by 3/31/2023 Replies due by 4/7/2023. Deposition due by 3/17/2023. Discovery due by 3/17/2023. Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/17/2023 at 04:30 PM before Judge Jed S. Rakoff. Ready for Trial by 4/17/2023. (Signed by Judge Jed S. Rakoff on 11/9/2022) (kv)
November 9, 2022 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Jed S. Rakoff: Telephonic Initial Pretrial Conference held on 11/9/2022, ( Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/17/2023 at 04:30 PM before Judge Jed S. Rakoff in courtroom 14B of 500 Pearl Street.) (Kotowski, Linda)
November 2, 2022 Filing 10 PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN. Document filed by DARR Lazers, LLC..(Castellano, Carmine)
October 24, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Joseph Karl Jones on behalf of Pro-Line Solutions, Inc...(Jones, Joseph)
October 24, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Anand A. Kapasi on behalf of Pro-Line Solutions, Inc...(Kapasi, Anand)
October 24, 2022 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Jed S. Rakoff: Telephone Conference held on 10/24/2022. Defendants unopposed motion to extend the deadline to file a responsive pleading to November 18, 2022 is also granted. (Kotowski, Linda)
October 24, 2022 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Jed S. Rakoff: Telephone Conference held on 10/24/2022,without recoding or transcription (Telephonic Initial Conference set for 11/9/2022 at 11:00 AM before Judge Jed S. Rakoff.) The dial in information remains the same as previously posted. (Kotowski, Linda)
October 19, 2022 Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE. Pro-Line Solutions, Inc. served on 10/13/2022. Document filed by DARR Lazers, LLC..(Castellano, Carmine)
October 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE OF COURT CONFERENCE: Initial Conference set for 10/27/2022 at 11:15 AM before Judge Jed S. Rakoff. The dial-in information for the call will be as follows: USA Toll-Free (888) 363-4735; USA Caller Paid/International Toll: (215) 446-3657; Access Code: 1086415. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jed S. Rakoff on 10/13/2022) (ks)
October 11, 2022 Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Pro-Line Solutions, Inc...(pc)
October 11, 2022 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Jed S. Rakoff. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc)
October 11, 2022 Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc)
October 11, 2022 Case Designated ECF. (pc)
October 10, 2022 Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Pro-Line Solutions, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by DARR Lazers, LLC..(Castellano, Carmine)
October 10, 2022 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Castellano, Carmine)
October 10, 2022 Filing 2 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by DARR Lazers, LLC..(Castellano, Carmine)
October 10, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Pro-Line Solutions, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26794288)Document filed by DARR Lazers, LLC..(Castellano, Carmine)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DARR Lazers, LLC v. Pro-Line Solutions, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DARR Lazers, LLC
Represented By: Carmine Joseph Castellano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pro-Line Solutions, Inc.
Represented By: Anand A. Kapasi
Represented By: Joseph Karl Jones
Represented By: Benjamin Jarret Wolf
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?