Morales v. Local 32BJ et al
| Lucia A. Morales |
| Local 32BJ, ABM Industries and Brookfield Properties |
| 1:2022cv08700 |
| October 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Jennifer L Rochon |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
INFORMATION PACKAGE MAILED to Lucia A. Morales 155-09 71th Ave. Apt. 3C Flushing, NY 11367, at, on 11/9/2022 Re: #6 Order of Service. The following document(s) were enclosed in the Service Package: a copy of the order of service or order to answer and other orders entered to date, Order granting IFP application, the individual practices of the district judge and magistrate judge assigned to your case, Instructions for Litigants Who Do Not Have Attorneys, Notice Regarding Privacy and Public Access to Electronic Case Files, a flyer about the free legal assistance clinic located in the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse (only in non prisoner cases), a Motions guide, a notice that the Pro Se Manual has been discontinued, a Notice of Change of Address form to use if your contact information changes, a handout explaining matters handled by magistrate judges and consent form to complete if all parties agree to proceed for all purposes before the magistrate judge, a form for you to complete if you consent to receive filings electronically (only in nonprisoner cases). (aan)
|
|
Filing 7
SUMMONS ISSUED as to ABM Industries, Brookfield Properties, Local 32BJ. (aan)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER OF SERVICE: The Court directs the Clerk of Court to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff, together with an information package. The Court also directs the Clerk of Court to issue summonses for Defendants; complete the USM-285 forms with the addresses for Defendants; and deliver all documents necessary to effect service on Defendants to the U.S. Marshals Service. (Signed by Judge Jennifer L. Rochon on 11/8/2022) (rro) Transmission to Pro Se Assistants for processing.
|
|
FRCP 4 SERVICE PACKAGE HAND DELIVERED TO U.S.M.: on 11/9/2022 Re: Judge Jennifer L. Rochon #6 Order of Service. The following document(s) were enclosed in the Service Package: Complaint, Summons, IFP, Order of Service, Completed U.S.M. form(s) for defendant(s) ABM Industries, Brookfield Properties, Local 32BJ. (aan)
|
|
Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sac)
|
|
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Jennifer L. Rochon. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (sac)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION: Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees is authorized. 28 U.S.C. 1915. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 10/14/2022) (vn)
|
|
Filing 3
PRO SE CONSENT TO RECEIVE ELECTRONIC SERVICE. The following party: Lucia A. Morales consents to receive electronic service via the ECF system. Document filed by Lucia A. Morales..(rdz)
|
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT against ABM Industries, Brookfield Properties, Local 32BJ. Document filed by Lucia A. Morales..(rdz)
|
|
Filing 1
REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Lucia A. Morales..(rdz)
|
|
Case Designated ECF. (rdz)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
