Peter v. United States of America
Petitioner: Sean Peter
Respondent: United States of America
Case Number: 1:2022cv08945
Filed: October 19, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Naomi Reice Buchwald
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 INFORMATION PACKAGE MAILED to Sean Peter, 78650054, at United States Penitentiary Canaan, P.O. Box 300, Waymart, PA 18472, on 11/9/2022 Re: #4 Order to Answer. The following document(s) were enclosed in the Service Package: a copy of the order of service or order to answer and other orders entered to date, the individual practices of the district judge and magistrate judge assigned to your case, Instructions for Litigants Who Do Not Have Attorneys, Notice Regarding Privacy and Public Access to Electronic Case Files, a Motions guide, a notice that the Pro Se Manual has been discontinued, a Notice of Change of Address form to use if your contact information changes, a handout explaining matters handled by magistrate judges and consent form to complete if all parties agree to proceed for all purposes before the magistrate judge. (sha)
November 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: The Court, having reviewed petitioner's motion brought under 28 U.S.C. 2255, hereby ORDERS: (1) That by December 20, 2022, the U.S. Attorneys Office shall file its answer to the motion. Petitioner shall have thirty days from the date on which petitioner is served with respondent's answer to file a reply. Absent further order, no other submissions will be accepted; and (2) That all further papers filed or submitted for filing must include the criminal docket number and should be docketed in both the criminal and civil case. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 11/7/2022) (mml)
November 7, 2022 Set/Reset Deadlines: Responses due by 12/20/2022. (mml)
October 19, 2022 Filing 2 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255). Document filed by Sean Peter..(rdz)
October 19, 2022 Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (28 U.S.C. 2255). NO FURTHER ENTRIES. PLEASE SEE CRIMINAL CASE: 17-cr-54 (NRB).Document filed by Sean Peter..(rdz)
October 19, 2022 Case Designated ECF. (rdz)
October 19, 2022 Magistrate Judge Andrew E. Krause is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (rdz)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Peter v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Sean Peter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?