Newton et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
| Joshua Newton and Alexander Newton |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. |
| 1:2022cv09116 |
| October 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Jennifer L Rochon |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO TRANSFER VENUE IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED as follows: 1. That the above-captioned action be, and hereby is, transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404(a); and 2. That upon the completion of the transfer to the Northern District of California, Defendant Meta Platforms, Inc. will have seven (7) days from that date to file its response to the Complaint. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jennifer L. Rochon on 1/9/2023) (jca)
|
| CASE TRANSFERRED OUT ELECTRONICALLY from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of New York to the United States District Court - District of Northern District of California. (jca) |
| Filing 8 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by Alexander Newton..(Bienenfeld, Saul) |
| Filing 7 FILING ERROR - WRONG EVENT TYPE SELECTED FROM MENU - PROPOSED ORDER. Document filed by Alexander Newton..(Bienenfeld, Saul) Proposed Order to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Modified on 1/6/2023 (km). |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - EVENT TYPE ERROR. Notice to Attorney Saul Bienenfeld to RE-FILE Document #7 Proposed Order. Use the event type Proposed Orders, Proposed Stipulation and Order. The document also needs to have handwritten signatures of the parties. (km) |
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE. All Defendants. Service was accepted by Jenn Bautista. Document filed by Alexander Newton..(Bienenfeld, Saul) |
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Unless and until the Court orders otherwise, counsel for all parties shall appear for an initial pretrial conference with the Court on February 8, 2023 at 2:00 P.M. Absent leave of Court obtained by letter-motion filed before the conference, all pretrial conferences must be attended by the attorney who will serve as principal trial counsel. Counsel who have entered a notice of appearance as of the issuance of this order are directed (1) to notify counsel for all other parties in this action who have not yet appeared by serving upon each of them a copy of this order and the Court's Individual Rules and Practices forthwith, and (2) to file proof of such notice with the Court. If unaware of the identity of counsel for any of the parties, counsel receiving this order must forthwith send a copy of this order and the Court's Individual Rules and Practices to that party personally. And as set forth herein. SO ORDERED. Initial Conference set for 2/8/2023 at 02:00 PM before Judge Jennifer L. Rochon. (Signed by Judge Jennifer L. Rochon on 10/26/2022) (ama)
|
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Meta Platforms, Inc.. (vf) |
| Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Saul Warren Bienenfeld. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Meta Platforms, Inc. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party role was entered incorrectly. (vf) Modified on 10/25/2022 (vf). |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Jennifer L. Rochon. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Saul Warren Bienenfeld. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Cause of Action code 15:294 Breach of Contract; Citizenship Plaintiff code 6 (Foreign Nation); Dollar Demand 700,000; Arbitration code e (Exempt); County code New York; Fee Status code due (due). The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Cause of Action code has been modified to 28:1330 Breach of Contract; the Citizenship Plaintiff code has been modified to 3 (Citizen or Subject of a Foreign Country); the Dollar Demand has been modified to Blank; the Arbitration code has been deleted; the County code has been modified to XX Out of U.S.; the Fee Status code has been modified to pd (paid). (vf) |
| Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Joshua Newton and Alexander Newton, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Alexander Newton, Joshua Newton..(Bienenfeld, Saul) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Bienenfeld, Saul) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Meta Platforms, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26863271)Document filed by Joshua Newton, Alexander Newton..(Bienenfeld, Saul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
