Brown v. Prove Identity, Inc. et al
| Matthew Brown |
| Prove Identity, Inc. and Rodger Desai |
| 1:2022cv09315 |
| October 31, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Analisa Torres |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT: NOW THEREFORE, in order to avoid the exchange of letters and briefs in the week between Christmas and New Year's Eve, the parties, through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. Defendants' time to answer, counterclaim, and/or otherwise move in response to the Complaint filed October 31, 2022, is extended up to and including January 16, 2023. 2. Plaintiff's time to respond to the Letter is extended up to and including January 4, 2023. SO ORDERED. Rodger Desai answer due 1/16/2023; Prove Identity, Inc. answer due 1/16/2023. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 12/23/2022) (kv)
|
|
Filing 10
PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by Matthew Brown..(Normand, Edward)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER: To protect the public health, while promoting the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding," Fed. R. Civ. P. 1, it is ORDERED pursuant to Rules 30(b)(3) and 30(b)( 4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that all depositions in this action may be taken viatelephone, videoconference, or other remote means. It is further ORDERED pursuant to Rule 30(b)(5) that a deposition will be deemed to have taken place "before an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28" if such officer attends the deposition using the same remote means used to connect all other participants, so long as all participants (including the officer) can clearly hear and be heard by all other participants. The parties are encouraged to engage in discovery through remote means at every available opportunity. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 11/09/2022) (ama)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER: To conserve resources, to promote judicial efficiency, and in an effort to achieve a faster disposition of this matter, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge, counsel for Defendants shall, by December 30, 2022, file a fully executed Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form, available at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/node/754 and attached to this order, on the docket. If the Court approves that form, all further proceedings will then be conducted before the assigned Magistrate Judge rather than before me. An information sheet on proceedings before magistrate judges is also attached to this order. Any appeal would be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, as it would be if the consent form were not signed and so ordered. If any party does not consent to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge, the parties must file a joint letter, by December 30, 2022, advising the Court that the parties do not consent, but without disclosing the identity of the party or parties who do not consent. The parties are free to withhold consent without negative consequences. SO ORDERED., ( Motions due by 12/30/2022.) (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 11/09/2022) (ama)
|
|
Filing 7
INITIAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Counsel for all parties are directed to submit a joint letter and a jointly proposed Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order by December 30, 2022, in accordance with Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the instructions set forth below. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF IS DIRECTED TO IMMEDIATELY SEND A COPY OF THIS ORDER AND THE COURT'S INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES TO ALL PARTIES. And as set forth herein. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 11/09/2022) (ama)
|
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Prove Identity, Inc...(pc)
|
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Rodger Desai..(pc)
|
|
Case Designated ECF. (pc)
|
|
Magistrate Judge Jennifer Willis is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc)
|
|
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Analisa Torres. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc)
|
|
Filing 4
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Normand, Edward)
|
|
Filing 3
REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Rodger Desai, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Matthew Brown..(Normand, Edward)
|
|
Filing 2
REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Prove Identity, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Matthew Brown..(Normand, Edward)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Rodger Desai, Prove Identity, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26895494)Document filed by Matthew Brown..(Normand, Edward)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
