Philippeaux v. Abrams et al
Philander Philippeaux |
Judge Ronnie Abrams, Magistrate Sarah Neptburn and Attorney General Merrick Garland |
1:2022cv09391 |
November 1, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Laura Taylor Swain |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT(Affirmation) of Philander Philippeaux UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, Re: proof of service of Summons & Complaint. Document filed by Philander Philippeaux. (sc) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO THE CLERK OF THIS COURT, Re: Plaintiff's request for the Clerk to mail out all correspondences to Plaintiff at the address listed in the Summons etc. Document filed by Philander Philippeaux. (sc) |
Mailed a copy of Summons Issued to Philander Philippeaux at 18083 SW 13th Street, Pembroke, FL 33029. (sha) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Judge Ronnie Abrams, U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland, Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn. (sha) |
Filing 6 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to U.S. Attorney General Merick Garland, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Philander Philippeaux. (sc) |
Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Philander Philippeaux. (sc) |
Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Judge Ronnie Abrams, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by P. Philippeaux. (sc) Modified on 11/29/2022 (sc). Modified on 11/29/2022 (sc). |
Transmission to Pro Se Assistants. Transmitted re: #5 Request for Issuance of Summons, to the Pro Se Assistants for processing. (sc) |
Transmission to Pro Se Assistants. Transmitted re: #6 Request for Issuance of Summons, to the Pro Se Assistants for processing. (sc) |
Transmission to Pro Se Assistants. Transmitted re: #4 Request for Issuance of Summons, to the Pro Se Assistants for processing. (sc) |
Pro Se Payment of Fee Processed: $402.00 Check processed by the Finance Department on 11/10/2022, Receipt Number 8352. (stt) |
MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 3. Mailed to: Philander Philippeaux 18083 SW 13th Street Pembroke, FL 33029. (kh) |
Filing 3 ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF FEE OR IFP APPLICATION & PRISONER AUTHORIZATION: Plaintiff is directed to render payment of the filing fee or submit an IFP application & Prisoner Authorization to this Court's Pro Se Office within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Filing Fee due by 12/5/2022. In Forma Pauperis (IFP) Application due by 12/5/2022. Prisoner Authorization Form due by 12/5/2022. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 11/3/2022) (Attachments: #1 Supplement IFP, #2 Supplement Prisoner Authorization) (aan) |
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (sac) |
Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Ronni Abrams, Sarah Neptburn, Merrick Garland, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Philander Philippeaux..(rdz) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ronnie Abrams, Merrick Garland, Sarah Neptburn. Document filed by Philander Philippeaux..(rdz) |
Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.