Matos v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: MARIA MATOS
Defendant: Greyhound Lines, Inc. and John Doe, Intending to be the Operator of the Greyhound Bus
Case Number: 1:2022cv09522
Filed: November 8, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: John P Cronan
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting #10 Letter Motion for Extension of Time. The request is granted. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by January 24, 2023. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the motion pending at Docket Number 10. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 12/16/2022) (jca)
December 16, 2022 Set/Reset Deadlines: Greyhound Lines, Inc. answer due 1/24/2023. (jca)
December 15, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Steven Bradley Saal on behalf of Greyhound Lines, Inc...(Saal, Steven)
December 15, 2022 Filing 10 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time addressed to Judge John P. Cronan from Harold L. Moroknek dated 12/15/22. Document filed by Greyhound Lines, Inc...(Moroknek, Harold)
December 15, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Harold L. Moroknek on behalf of Greyhound Lines, Inc...(Moroknek, Harold)
November 17, 2022 Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Greyhound Lines, Inc..(vf)
November 17, 2022 Filing 7 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Greyhound Lines, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Maria Matos..(Schatz, Howard)
November 15, 2022 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney Howard R. Schatz to RE-FILE Document No. #6 Request for Issuance of Summons. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Summonses cannot be issued to John Doe; The Request for Issuance of Summons cannot be issued for the party requested because it does not identify the party subject to service. Pursuant to FRCP Rule 4(a)(1)(A) and FRCP Rule 4(a)(1)(B): a summons must name the parties and be directed to the defendant. Once the party has been identified, the filing party may request a summons at that time. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (sj)
November 14, 2022 Filing 6 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Greyhound Lines, Inc. and John Doe, Intending to be the Operator of the Greyhound Bus, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Maria Matos..(Schatz, Howard) Modified on 11/15/2022 (sj).
November 14, 2022 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney Howard R. Schatz to RE-FILE Document No. #4 Request for Issuance of Summons,. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the date field on the offical A.O. Summons form was completed by the attorney; party name on 'As to' docket entry text must correspond precisely; party name listed on Summons PDF 'TO' field does not correspond to ECF Docket Entry, enter the party name as to whom summons is to be issued for; The Request for Issuance of Summons cannot be issued for the party requested "John Doe" because it does not identify the party subject to service. Pursuant to FRCP Rule 4(a)(1)(A) and FRCP Rule 4(a)(1)(B) : a summons must name the parties and be directed to the defendant. Once the party has been identified, the filing party may request a summons at that time. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (lal)
November 11, 2022 Filing 5 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Schatz, Howard)
November 11, 2022 Filing 4 FILING ERROR PDF ERROR - SUMMONS REQUEST As To - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Greyhound Lines, Inc. and John Doe, Intending to be the Operator of the Greyhound Bus, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Maria Matos..(Schatz, Howard) Modified on 11/14/2022 (lal).
November 11, 2022 ADD PARTY FOR PLEADING. Defendants/Respondents John Doe, Intending to be the Operator of the Greyhound Bus added. Party added pursuant to #1 Complaint.Document filed by Maria Matos. Related document: #1 Complaint..(Schatz, Howard)
November 9, 2022 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Howard R. Schatz. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Cause of Action code Disbarment Proceedings; Dollar Demand 2,000,000,000; County code Albany. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Cause of Action code has been modified to 28:1332 Diversity Action; the Dollar Demand has been modified to 2,000,000; the County code has been modified to Bronx. (vf)
November 9, 2022 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to attorney Howard R. Schatz to Document No. #1 Complaint. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the wrong event type was used to file the civil cover sheet. Civil Cover Sheet is filed as its own individual event. Re-file the document using the event type Civil Cover Sheet found under the event list Other Documents and attach the correct PDF. (vf)
November 9, 2022 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Howard R. Schatz re: Document No. #1 Complaint. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): all of the parties listed on the pleading were not entered on CM ECF. Add party John Doe with party text " Intending to be the Operator of the Greyhound Bus". Docket the event type Add Party to Pleading found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents... (vf)
November 9, 2022 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Howard R. Schatz. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: MARIA MATOS, Greyhound Lines, Inc.. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name was entered in all caps; party role was entered incorrectly. (vf)
November 9, 2022 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney Howard R. Schatz to RE-FILE Document No. #2 Notice (Other). The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the wrong event type was used to file the request for issuance of summons; the date field on the offical A.O. Summons form was completed by the attorney. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (vf)
November 9, 2022 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge John P. Cronan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf)
November 9, 2022 Case Designated ECF. (vf)
November 9, 2022 Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf)
November 8, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Lora Helen Gleicher on behalf of MARIA MATOS..(Gleicher, Lora)
November 8, 2022 Filing 2 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT - SUMMONS REQUESTED - WRONG EVENT TYPE SELECTED FROM MENU - NOTICE of Notice of summons in civil action re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by MARIA MATOS..(Schatz, Howard) Modified on 11/9/2022 (vf).
November 8, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Greyhound Lines, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26931650)Document filed by MARIA MATOS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet).(Schatz, Howard)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Matos v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Represented By: Harold L. Moroknek
Represented By: Steven Bradley Saal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe, Intending to be the Operator of the Greyhound Bus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MARIA MATOS
Represented By: Lora Helen Gleicher
Represented By: Howard R. Schatz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?