Stanley v. Pliler
Petitioner: Aaron R. Stanley
Respondent: Pliler
Case Number: 1:2022cv09769
Filed: November 15, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Presiding Judge: Andrew L Carter
Referring Judge: Laura Taylor Swain
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jerry Jia-Wei Fang on behalf of Pliler..(Fang, Jerry)
December 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 HABEAS PACKAGE MAILED to Aaron R. Stanley 99474-555 Federal Correctional Institution P.O. Box 1000 Otisville, NY 10963, at, on 12/14/2022 Re: #8 Order to Answer, 28 U.S.C. 2241. The following document(s) were enclosed in the Service Package: a copy of the order of service or order to answer and other orders entered to date, the individual practices of the district judge and magistrate judge assigned to your case, Instructions for Litigants Who Do Not Have Attorneys, Notice Regarding Privacy and Public Access to Electronic Case Files, a Motions guide, a notice that the Pro Se Manual has been discontinued, a Notice of Change of Address form to use if your contact information changes, a handout explaining matters handled by magistrate judges and consent form to complete if all parties agree to proceed for all purposes before the magistrate judge. (aan)
December 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER TO ANSWER, 28 U.S.C. 2241: The Court, having examined the petition in this action, which Petitioner filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241, hereby ORDERS that: The Clerk of Court shall electronically notify the Civil Division of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York that this Order has been issued. Within sixty days of the date of this order, the U.S. Attorney's Office shall file an answer or other pleadings in response to the petition. Petitioner may file reply papers, if any, within thirty days from the date Petitioner is served with Respondent's answer. Pliler answer due on 2/13/2023. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 12/13/2022) (ate) Transmission to Pro Se Assistants for processing.
December 8, 2022 Opinion or Order NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. Judge Laura Taylor Swain is no longer assigned to the case. (sac)
December 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sac)
November 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Pro Se Payment of Fee Processed: $5.00 Money Order processed by the Finance Department on 11/29/2022, Receipt Number 9205. (prs)
November 18, 2022 Opinion or Order MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 6. Mailed to: Aaron R. Stanley 99474-555 Federal Correctional Institution P.O. Box 1000 Otisville, NY 10963. (kh)
November 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF FEE OR IFP APPLICATION: Plaintiff is directed to render payment of the filing fee or submit an IFP application to this Court's Pro Se Office within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Filing Fee due by 12/19/2022. In Forma Pauperis (IFP) Application due by 12/19/2022. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 11/17/2022) (sha)
November 17, 2022 Opinion or Order NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (sac)
November 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Aaron R. Stanley in Support of MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL and TO EXPAND THE RECORD. Document filed by Aaron R. Stanley..(rdz)
November 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 APPLICATION to Appoint Counsel. Document filed by Aaron R. Stanley..(rdz)
November 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MEMORANDUM BRIEF in Support re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Document filed by Aaron R. Stanley..(rdz)
November 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION FOR Expansion of the Record. Document filed by Aaron R. Stanley..(rdz)
November 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241. Document filed by Aaron R. Stanley..(rdz)
November 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Case Designated ECF. (rdz)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stanley v. Pliler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Aaron R. Stanley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Pliler
Represented By: Jerry Jia-Wei Fang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?