Brown v. Baby Delight, Inc.
| Lamar Brown |
| Baby Delight, Inc. |
| 1:2022cv10109 |
| November 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Edgardo Ramos |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT: Plaintiffs and Defendant hereby stipulate and agree to extend the time period for Defendant Baby Delight, Inc. to answer, move or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint to February 3, 2023. SO ORDERED., Baby Delight, Inc. answer due 2/3/2023. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 1/04/2023) (ama)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by William Edward Vita on behalf of Baby Delight, Inc...(Vita, William) |
| Filing 6 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by Baby Delight, Inc...(Vita, William) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint served. Baby Delight, Inc. served on 12/15/2022, answer due 1/5/2023. Service was accepted by Jason Macari. Document filed by Lamar Brown..(Khaimov, Mars) |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Baby Delight, Inc...(pc) |
| Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
| Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Edgardo Ramos. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Baby Delight, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Lamar Brown..(Khaimov, Mars) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Khaimov, Mars) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Baby Delight, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-27013118)Document filed by Lamar Brown..(Khaimov, Mars) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Brown v. Baby Delight, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lamar Brown | |
| Represented By: | Mars Khaimov |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Baby Delight, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | William Edward Vita |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
