Nieves v. The City of New York et al
| Shardheem "Shardy&qu Nieves and Shardheem Nieves |
| The City of New York, James P. O'Neill and John Does 1-7 |
| 1:2022cv10204 |
| December 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Mary Kay Vyskocil |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #10 CONSENT LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or otherwise respond to complaint addressed to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil from Mark D. Zuckerman dated December 28, 2022., #1 Complaint. Granted. SO ORDERED. The City of New York answer due 2/24/2023. (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 12/28/2022) (tg)
|
|
Filing 10
CONSENT LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or otherwise respond to complaint addressed to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil from Mark D. Zuckerman dated December 28, 2022. Document filed by The City of New York..(Zuckerman, Mark)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Mark David Zuckerman on behalf of The City of New York..(Zuckerman, Mark)
|
|
Filing 8
SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. The City of New York served on 12/16/2022, answer due 1/6/2023. Service was made by EMAIL. Document filed by Shardheem Nieves..(Rankin, David)
|
|
Filing 7
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to The City of New York. (sj)
|
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to James P. O'Neill. (sj)
|
|
Case Designated ECF. (sj)
|
|
Magistrate Judge Jennifer Willis is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sj)
|
|
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(sj)
|
|
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney David Bruce Rankin. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Shardheem "Shardy&qu Nieves. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name was entered with quotation marks. (sj)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Keegan Stephan on behalf of Shardheem "Shardy&qu Nieves..(Stephan, Keegan)
|
|
Filing 4
REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Former New York City Police Department Commissioner JAMES P. ONEILL, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Shardheem "Shardy&qu Nieves..(Rankin, David)
|
|
Filing 3
REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to THE CITY OF NEW YORK, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Shardheem "Shardy&qu Nieves..(Rankin, David)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Rankin, David)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against John Does 1-7, James P. O'Neill, The City of New York. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-27028530)Document filed by Shardheem "Shardy&qu Nieves..(Rankin, David)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
