Correa v. Carnahan et al
| Colin Scott Kana' Correa and Colin Scott Kana'i Correa |
| Robin Carnahan, Aluanda Drain and O'Neal |
| 1:2022cv10213 |
| December 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Andrew L Carter |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
INFORMATION PACKAGE MAILED to Colin Scott Kana'i Correa 90 West Street Apt. 17X New York, NY 10006-1048, at, on 12/20/2022 Re: #5 Order of Service. The following document(s) were enclosed in the Service Package: a copy of the order of service or order to answer and other orders entered to date, Order granting IFP application, a copy of the Mediation Referral Order for Pro Se Employment Discrimination Cases, the individual practices of the district judge and magistrate judge assigned to your case, Instructions for Litigants Who Do Not Have Attorneys, Notice Regarding Privacy and Public Access to Electronic Case Files, a flyer about the free legal assistance clinic located in the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse (only in non prisoner cases), a Motions guide, a notice that the Pro Se Manual has been discontinued, a Notice of Change of Address form to use if your contact information changes, a handout explaining matters handled by magistrate judges and consent form to complete if all parties agree to proceed for all purposes before the magistrate judge, a form for you to complete if you consent to receive filings electronically (only in nonprisoner cases). (aan)
|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Robin Carnahan. (aan) |
| MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 6. Mailed to: ColinScottKana'i Correa 90 West Street Apt. 17X New York, NY 10006-1048. (dsh) |
| FRCP 4 SERVICE PACKAGE HAND DELIVERED TO U.S.M.: on 12/20/2022 Re: Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. #5 Order of Service. The following document(s) were enclosed in the Service Package: Complaint, Summons, IFP, Order of Service, Completed U.S.M. form(s) for defendant(s) Robin Carnahan. (aan) |
|
Filing 6
MEDIATION REFERRAL ORDER FOR PRO SE EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CASES: It is ORDERED that this pro se case is referred for mediation to the Court's Mediation Program. Local Civil Rule 83.9 and the Mediation Program Procedures shall govern the mediation. Unless otherwise ordered, the mediation will have no effect upon any scheduling order issued by this Court, and all parties are obligated to continue to litigate the case. It is further ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall attempt to locate pro bono counsel to represent Plaintiff at the mediation. Pro bono counsel will contact Plaintiff directly. The time to assign a mediator under Local Civil Rule 83.9 and the Court's Mediation Program Procedures will be deferred until pro bono counsel has filed a Notice of Limited Appearance of Pro Bono Counsel. Pro bono counsel will represent Plaintiff solely for purposes of the mediation, and that representation will terminate at the conclusion of the mediation process. It is further ORDERED that any objection by Plaintiff either to the mediation or to the Court's request for pro bono counsel to represent Plaintiff in the mediation must be filed within 14 days of this order. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 12/19/2022) (ate)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER OF SERVICE: Plaintiff's claims against Drain and O'Neal are dismissed for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The Clerk of Court is instructed to (1) issue a summons for Carnahan (2) complete the USM-285 form with the address for this defendant, (3) mark the box on the USM-285 forms labeled "Check for service on U.S.A.," and (4) deliver to the U.S. Marshals Service all documents necessary to effect service on the defendant. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v.United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). The Clerk of Court is directed to mail an information package to Plaintiff. DEFENDANT AND SERVICE ADDRESS: Robin Carnahan Administrator General Services Administration 1800 F Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20405-0002. Aluanda Drain (Associate Administrator for Civil Rights) and O'Neal terminated. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 12/19/2022) (ate) Transmission to Pro Se Assistants for processing.
|
| Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (laq) |
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (laq) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION: Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees is authorized. 28 U.S.C. 1915. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 12/8/2022) (vn)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Robin Carnahan, Aluanda Drain. Document filed by Colin Scott Kana' Correa..(rdz) |
| Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Colin Scott Kana' Correa..(rdz) |
| Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
