Ottah v. MTA
Plaintiff: Chikezie Ottah
Defendant: MTA
Case Number: 1:2022cv10435
Filed: December 9, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Jesse M Furman
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 24, 2023 MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 6. Mailed to: Chikezie Ottah 648 Dorothea Lane Elmont, NY 11003. (dsh)
January 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Ottah shall, no later than February 23, 2023, communicate with the Court, in writing, as to whether service on Defendant was proper. To the extent that Ottah makes factual representations about when and how he accomplished service, he should do so in a declaration sworn under penalty of perjury. If the Court does not receive any communication from Ottah by February 23, 2023, the Court will deem the prior service improper. If so, Ottah will still have until March 13, 2023, to effectuate proper service on Defendant. Finally, the Court notes that there is a Pro Se Law Clinic in this District to assist non- incarcerated people who are parties in civil cases and do not have lawyers. The Clinic may be able to provide Ottah with guidance and assistance in connection with this case and the issues discussed above. The Pro Se Law Clinic is run by a private organization called the New York Legal Assistance Group; it is not part of, or run by, the Court (and, among other things, therefore cannot accept filings on behalf of the Court, which must still be made by any unrepresented party through the Pro Se Intake Unit). The Clinic is located in the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Centre Street, New York, New York, in Room LL22, which is just inside the Pearl Street entrance to that Courthouse. Under normal circumstances, the Clinic is open on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m., except on days when the Court is closed. An unrepresented party can make an appointment in person or by calling (212) 659-6190. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. SO ORDERED. ( Service due by 3/13/2023.) (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 1/23/2023) (tg)
January 17, 2023 Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT OF FACT of Kenneth Otah. Document filed by Chikezie Ottah. (sc)
January 17, 2023 Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED(Proof of Delivery) Summons and Complaint served. MTA served on 12/22/2022, answer due 1/12/2023. Service was accepted by MTA. Service was made by Mail #1575722102US. Document filed by Chikezie Ottah. (sc)
December 13, 2022 Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sac)
December 13, 2022 NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Jesse M. Furman. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (sac)
December 12, 2022 Filing 2 LETTER from C. Ottah dated 12/12/22 re: I am adding today 12/12/22 this patent, U. S. Patent 7,152,840 Documents to already filed documents. Document filed by Chikezie Ottah.(sc)
December 12, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MTA. Document filed by Chikezie Ottah..(rdz)
December 12, 2022 Case Designated ECF. (rdz)
December 12, 2022 Pro Se Payment of Fee Processed: $402.00 Money Order processed by the Finance Department on 12/12/2022, Receipt Number 9540. (sw) Modified on 12/13/2022 (sw).
December 12, 2022 SUMMONS ISSUED as to MTA. (dsh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ottah v. MTA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chikezie Ottah
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MTA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?