Lipton v. Collective Media, Inc.
| Shelley Lipton |
| Collective Media, Inc. |
| 1:2022cv10512 |
| December 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Jennifer L Rochon |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF DEFAULT as to Collective Media, Inc.(km) |
| Filing 13 DECLARATION of Joshua D. Vera in Support re: #12 Proposed Clerk's Certificate of Default. Document filed by Shelley Lipton..(Vera, Joshua) |
| Filing 12 PROPOSED CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF DEFAULT. Document filed by Shelley Lipton..(Vera, Joshua) Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers). Modified on 1/17/2023 (km). |
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Mediation Order, Order for Pretrial Conference, Filed complaint and exhibits, and copy of Judge's rules and practices served on Collective Media, Inc. on December 21, 2022. Document filed by Shelley Lipton..(Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint served. Collective Media, Inc. served on 12/16/2022, answer due 1/6/2023. Service was accepted by JANE DOE, LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF CSC, DESIGNATED AGENT. Document filed by Shelley Lipton..(Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Joshua D. Vera on behalf of Shelley Lipton..(Vera, Joshua) |
Filing 8
ORDER REGARDING EARLY MEDIATION AND THE INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: This case has been assigned to this Court for all purposes. In the Cour's experience,cases of this nature often benefit from early mediation. To that end, by separate Order to be entered today, the Court is referring this case to the Court-annexed Mediation Program. Unless and until the Court orders otherwise, the parties shall schedule a mediation to take place no later than two weeks before the initial pretrial conference scheduled below. Unless and until the Court orders otherwise, counsel for all parties shall appear for an initial pretrial conference with the Court on March 20, 2023 at 11:00 a.m. Absent leave of Court obtained by letter-motion filed before the conference, all pretrial conferences must be attended by the attorney who will serve as principal trial counsel. The joint letter shall not exceed three (3) pages, and shall provide the following information in separate paragraphs: as set forth herein. Counsel who have entered a notice of appearance as of the issuance of this order aredirected (1) to notify counsel for all other parties in this action who have not yet appeared by serving upon each of them a copy of this order and the Court's Individual Rules and Practices forthwith, and (2) to file proof of such notice with the Court. If unaware of the identity of counsel for any of the parties, counsel receiving this order must forthwith send a copy of this order and the Court's Individual Rules and Practices to that party personally. SO ORDERED. Initial Conference set for 3/20/2023 at 11:00 AM before Judge Jennifer L. Rochon. (Signed by Judge Jennifer L. Rochon on 12/20/2022) (ama)
|
|
Filing 7
MEDIATION REFERRAL ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that this case, involving claims under the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. 101 et seq., is referred for mediation to the Court-annexed Mediation Program. The parties are hereby notified that Local Rule 83.9 shall govern the mediation and are directed to participate in the mediation in good faith. The mediation should take place at least two weeks prior to the Initial Pretrial Conference, which is currently scheduled (by separate Order to be entered today) for March 20, 2023. The mediation will have no effect upon any scheduling Order issued by this Court without leave of this Court. The Court specifically requests a mediator with expertise in copyright matters be assigned. To facilitate prompt mediation, Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to file proof of service no more than three days after service has been effected. Plaintiff is further ORDERED to produce to Defendant, by the earlier of 14 days after service of process or three business days in advance of any mediation session, (1) copies of records sufficient to show the royalty paid the last three times the work (e.g., the photograph or video) at issue in this case was licensed and (2) the number of times the work was licensed in the last five years. SO ORDERED. Please reference the following when corresponding with the Mediation Office. E-mail MediationOffice@nysd.uscourts.gov, telephone (212) 805-0643, and facsimile (212) 805-0647. Mediator to be Assigned by 1/3/2023. (Signed by Judge Jennifer L. Rochon on 12/20/2022) (jca)
|
| Filing 6 AO 121 FORM COPYRIGHT - CASE OPENING - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 17 U.S.C. 508, the Register of Copyrights is hereby advised that a court action has been filed on the following copyright(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Form e-mailed to Register of Copyrights. (sj) |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Collective Media, Inc.. (sj) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Jennifer L. Rochon. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(sj) |
| Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sj) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sj) |
| Filing 4 AO 121 FORM COPYRIGHT - NOTICE OF SUBMISSION BY ATTORNEY. AO 121 Form Copyright for case opening submitted to court for review..(Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Collective Media, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Shelley Lipton..(Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Collective Media, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-27078999)Document filed by Shelley Lipton. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Original Photographs, #2 Exhibit Infringing Use of the Photographs).(Sanders, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lipton v. Collective Media, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Shelley Lipton | |
| Represented By: | Craig B. Sanders |
| Represented By: | Joshua D. Vera |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Collective Media, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
