Trivedi v. General Electric Company et al
| Madhuri Trivedi |
| General Electric Company, Larry Culp, GE Board of Directors, Michael Swinford, Carl Conrath, John Dineen, David Mehring, Nicole Boyles, Adam Holton, Michael Truman, Ayesha Khan, Jeffrey Immelt, Timothy Kottak, David Elario, Robert Swieringa, Susan Hockfield, Diane Smith, Dipti Patel, Nathan Davis, Gregory Stratton, William Barbiaux, Reema Podddar, Michael Harsh, Fragomen, Del Rey, Bersen & Loewy, LLP, Jenny Schrager, Foley & Mansfield Law Firm, U.S. Department of Labor, Secretary Martin Walsh, Daniel Koh and OSHA |
| 1:2022cv10630 |
| December 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Laura Taylor Swain |
| Securities/Commodities |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Received e-mail from the United States District Court - District of Massachusetts acknowledging receipt of transferred case. Assigned Case Number: 1:23-cv-10067, filed on 1/10/2023. (sgz) |
| Filing 11 SECOND MOTION, Re: to Recuse and refrain from assigning in the future, sua sponte, to Judge Swain - instead of assigning randomly as per law etc. Document filed by Madhuri Trivedi.(sc) |
| Filing 10 LETTER from M. Trivedi, re: "Letter to Clerk of the Court, Ruby J. Krajick" - As an administrative staff, please get involved and read my docket filings etc. Please ask Judge Swain to refrain from getting involved sua sponte in my case ever again. She nor her law clerk are reading my filings. Please arrange a conference call etc. Document filed by Madhuri Trivedi.(sc) |
| Filing 9 LETTER addressed to Judge Laura Taylor Swain from M. Trivedi, re: "MOTION TO RECUSE JUDGE LAURA SWAIN (AND ASSIGN THIS CASE RANDOMLY INSTEAD OF JUDGE SWAIN ASSIGNING IT TO HERSELF SUA SPONTE. IT IS NOT LEGAL)." - Your transfer is illegal and is Obstruction of Justice etc. Document filed by Madhuri Trivedi.(sc) |
Filing 8
ORDER: Plaintiff's pending motions (ECF Nos. 5, 7) are denied. Plaintiff is advised not to contact chambers. Plaintiff may call the court's Pro Se Intake Unit at (212) 805-0175, should she need procedural advice or have any procedural questions about her case. Plaintiff remains warned that further duplicative or frivolous litigation in this court will result in an order barring Plaintiff from filing new actions in this court without prior permission. See 28 U.S.C. 1651. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED.denying #5 Motion re: #5 MOTION FOR A CONFERENCE CALL. MOTION for Hearing. ; denying #5 Motion for Hearing. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 12/21/22) (rdz)
|
| Filing 7 LETTER addressed to Judge Laura Taylor Swain from M. Trivedi, re: "MOTION TO ASSIGN THIS CASE EITHER RANDOMLY TO ANOTHER JUDGE OR TO JUDGE JESSE FURMAN, JUDGE KATHERINE/ MOTION TO RECONSIDER TRANSFER/ MOTION TO HAVE CONFERENCE CALL( I FILED ONE MOTION ALREADY YESTERDAY)." Document filed by Madhuri Trivedi.(sc) |
| CASE TRANSFERRED OUT ELECTRONICALLY from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of New York to the United States District Court - District of District of Massachusetts.(rdz) |
|
Filing 6
TRANSFER ORDER: The Clerk of Court is directed to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. Whether Plaintiff should be permitted to proceed further without prepayment of fees is a determination to be made by the transferee court. A summons shall not issue from this Court. This order closes this case. Plaintiff is warned that further duplicative or frivolous litigation in this court will result in an order barring Plaintiff from filing new actions in this court without prior permission. See 28 U.S.C. 1651. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 12/19/22) (rdz) Transmission to Office of the Clerk of Court for processing.
|
| Filing 5 MOTION FOR A CONFERENCE CALL, MOTION FOR HEARING WITH JUDGE. Document filed by Madhuri Trivedi.(sc) |
| Filing 4 PRO SE CONSENT TO RECEIVE ELECTRONIC SERVICE. The following party: Madhuri Trivedi consents to receive electronic service via the ECF system. Document filed by Madhuri Trivedi.(sc) |
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (sac) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS. Document filed by Madhuri Trivedi..(rdz) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET..(rdz) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against William Barbiaux, Nicole Boyles, Carl Conrath, Larry Culp, Nathan Davis, John Dineen, David Elario, Foley & Mansfield Law Firm, Fragomen, Del Rey, Bersen & Loewy, LLP, GE Board of Directors, General Electric Company, Michael Harsh, Susan Hockfield, Adam Holton, Jeffrey Immelt, Ayesha Khan, Daniel Koh, Timothy Kottak, David Mehring, OSHA, Dipti Patel, Reema Podddar, Jenny Schrager, Diane Smith, Gregory Stratton, Robert Swieringa, Michael Swinford, Michael Truman. Document filed by Madhuri Trivedi. (Attachments: #1 Errata pages).(rdz) |
| Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
