Campbell v. Goop Inc.
Plaintiff: Jovan Campbell
Defendant: Goop Inc.
Case Number: 1:2022cv10903
Filed: December 27, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Jennifer L Rochon
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #9 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #5 Order,,,,, addressed to Judge Jennifer L. Rochon from Nancy Ann Del Pizzo dated February 3, 2023. The request is GRANTED. The parties shall notify the Court no later than March 19, 2023 as to whether the case has settled. Defendant shall respon to the Complaint no later than May 3, 2023. Goop Inc. answer due 5/3/2023 (Signed by Judge Jennifer L. Rochon on 2/6/2023) (jca)
February 3, 2023 Filing 9 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #5 Order,,,,, addressed to Judge Jennifer L. Rochon from Nancy Ann Del Pizzo dated February 3, 2023. Document filed by Goop Inc...(Del Pizzo, Nancy)
February 3, 2023 Filing 8 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Goop Inc...(Del Pizzo, Nancy)
February 3, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Nancy Ann Del Pizzo on behalf of Goop Inc...(Del Pizzo, Nancy)
January 26, 2023 Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint served. Goop Inc. served on 1/25/2023, answer due 2/15/2023. Service was accepted by Unknown, manager of mailbox facility. Document filed by Jovan Campbell..(Khaimov, Mars)
January 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: This case has been assigned to me for all purposes. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days of service of the summons and complaint, the parties must meet and confer for at least one hour in a good-faith attempt to settle this action. In their discussions, the parties should consider whether plaintiff has satisfied the threshold requirement of standing. See, e.g., Calcano v. Swarovski N. Am. Ltd., 36 F.4th 68, 77-78 (2d Cir. 2022); Harty v. W. Point Realty, Inc., 28 F.4th 435, 443-44 (2d Cir. 2022). To the extent the parties are unable to settle the case themselves, they must also discuss whether further settlement discussions through the district's court-annexed mediation program or before a magistrate judge would be productive at this time. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within fifteen (15) additional days (i.e., within forty-five (45) days of service of the summons and complaint), the parties must submit a joint letter informing the Court whether the parties have settled. If the parties do not reach a settlement, the parties shall in the joint letter request that the Court (1) refer the case to mediation or a magistrate judge for a settlement conference (and indicate a preference between the two options), or (2) proceed with an initial status conference. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jennifer L. Rochon on 1/4/2023) (tg)
December 28, 2022 Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Goop Inc.. (vf)
December 28, 2022 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Jennifer L. Rochon. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf)
December 28, 2022 Magistrate Judge Valerie Figueredo is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf)
December 28, 2022 Case Designated ECF. (vf)
December 27, 2022 Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Goop Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Jovan Campbell..(Khaimov, Mars)
December 27, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Khaimov, Mars)
December 27, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Goop Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-27135820)Document filed by Jovan Campbell..(Khaimov, Mars)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Campbell v. Goop Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jovan Campbell
Represented By: Mars Khaimov
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Goop Inc.
Represented By: Nancy Ann Del Pizzo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?