Gong v. Sarnoff et al
| Junwu Gong |
| Sarnoff M Stuart, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Carl M Stanton, CITY OF NEW YORK, Officer John Doe 1, Officer John Doe 2, Officer John Doe 3, Officer Jane Doe and Stuart M. Sarnoff |
| 1:2023cv00343 |
| January 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Lewis J Liman |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by William Joseph Sushon on behalf of O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Stuart M. Sarnoff..(Sushon, William)
|
|
Filing 16
NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: This case has been assigned to me for all purposes. It is hereby: ORDERED that counsel for all parties appear for an Initial Pretrial Conference by TELEPHONE on April 14, 2023, at 12:00 p.m. Parties are directed to dial into the Court's teleconference number at 888-251-2909, Access Code 2123101, and follow the necessary prompts. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by one week prior to conference, the parties jointly submit to the Court a proposed Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order. A template is available at https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-lewis-j-liman. This document should be filed electronically on ECF, consistent with the Court's Individual Practices in Civil Cases, which are available on the same webpage. Parties should consult the Individual Practices for guidance on the matters to be discussed at the Initial Pretrial Conference and for the Court's rules with respect to communications with Chambers and other procedural matters. The time period for any Defendant intending to move to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 12 will be extended until further order of the Court upon the filing of a simple letter with the Court within the time permitted under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a) and prior to the time the above-mentioned submission is made. Such letter should simply indicate in one sentence the Defendant's intent to make a motion to dismiss. Counsel for Plaintiff is ordered to notify Defendants of this Notice. SO ORDERED.Telephonic Initial Conference set for 4/14/2023 at 12:00 PM before Judge Lewis J. Liman. (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 2/28/2023) (ama)
|
|
Filing 15
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Carl M Stanton..(pc)
|
|
Filing 14
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to O'Melveny & Myers LLP..(pc)
|
|
Filing 13
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Stuart M. Sarnoff..(pc)
|
|
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney Richard N. Freeth to Document No. #9 Request for Issuance of Summons, #12 Request for Issuance of Summons, #10 Request for Issuance of Summons, #11 Request for Issuance of Summons,. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): The Request for Issuance of Summons cannot be issued for the party requested because it does not identify the party subject to service. Pursuant to FRCP Rule 4(a)(1)(A) and FRCP Rule 4(a)(1)(B) : a summons must name the parties and be directed to the defendant. Once the party has been identified, the filing party may request a summons at that time. (pc)
|
|
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney Richard N. Freeth to RE-FILE Document No. #8 Request for Issuance of Summons. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): party name on the docket entry do not match the party name on the summons (New York City). Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (pc)
|
|
Filing 12
FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - SUMMONS REQUEST PDF ERROR - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Officer Jane Doe, re: #2 Complaint,. Document filed by Junwu Gong..(Freeth, Richard) Modified on 2/24/2023 (pc).
|
|
Filing 11
FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - SUMMONS REQUEST PDF ERROR - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Officer John Doe 3, re: #2 Complaint,. Document filed by Junwu Gong..(Freeth, Richard) Modified on 2/24/2023 (pc).
|
|
Filing 10
FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - SUMMONS REQUEST PDF ERROR - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Officer John Doe 2, re: #2 Complaint,. Document filed by Junwu Gong..(Freeth, Richard) Modified on 2/24/2023 (pc).
|
|
Filing 9
FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - SUMMONS REQUEST PDF ERROR - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Officer John Doe 1, re: #2 Complaint,. Document filed by Junwu Gong..(Freeth, Richard) Modified on 2/24/2023 (pc).
|
|
Filing 8
FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - SUMMONS REQUEST As To - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to New York City, re: #2 Complaint,. Document filed by Junwu Gong..(Freeth, Richard) Modified on 2/24/2023 (pc).
|
|
Filing 7
REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Carl M. Stanton, re: #2 Complaint,. Document filed by Junwu Gong..(Freeth, Richard)
|
|
Filing 6
REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to O'Melveny & Meyers, LLP, re: #2 Complaint,. Document filed by Junwu Gong..(Freeth, Richard)
|
|
Filing 5
REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Stuart M. Sarnoff, re: #2 Complaint,. Document filed by Junwu Gong..(Freeth, Richard)
|
|
Filing 4
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Freeth, Richard)
|
|
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney Richard N. Freeth to RE-FILE Document No. #3 Request for Issuance of Summons,. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the PDF attached to the docket entry for the issuance of summons is not correct; defendant's name and address field was left blank. The Request for Issuance of Summons cannot be issued for the party requested because it does not identify the party subject to service. Pursuant to FRCP Rule 4(a)(1)(A) and FRCP Rule 4(a)(1)(B) : a summons must name the parties and be directed to the defendant. Once the party has been identified, the filing party may request a summons at that time. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (pc)
|
|
Filing 3
FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - SUMMONS REQUEST PDF ERROR - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to STUART M. SARNOFF, OMELVENY & MYERS LLP, CARL M. STANTON, CITY OF NEW YORK, OFFICER JOHN DOE 1, OFFICER JOHN DOE 2, OFFICER JOHN DOE 3, OFFICER JANE DOE,, re: #2 Complaint,. Document filed by Junwu Gong..(Freeth, Richard) Modified on 2/13/2023 (pc).
|
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT against City of New York, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Officer Jane Doe, Officer John Doe 1, Officer John Doe 2, Officer John Doe 3, Carl M Stanton. Document filed by Junwu Gong. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit article, #2 Exhibit article).(Freeth, Richard)
|
|
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO ELECTRONICALLY FILE CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to Attorney Richard N. Freeth. Attorney must electronically file the Civil Cover Sheet. Use the event type Civil Cover Sheet found under the event list Other Documents. (vf)
|
|
Case Designated ECF. (vf)
|
|
Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf)
|
|
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Lewis J. Liman. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf)
|
|
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Richard N. Freeth. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Dollar Demand $10,000,000,000. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Dollar Demand has been modified to 9,999,000. (vf)
|
|
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Richard N. Freeth. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: CITY OF NEW YORK; Sarnoff M. Stuart. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name was entered in all caps; party name entered incorrectly. (vf)
|
|
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Richard N. Freeth to RE-FILE Document No. #1 Complaint,. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the pleading was not signed. Re-file the pleading using the event type Complaint found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. (vf)
|
|
Filing 1
FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT - SIGNATURE ERROR - COMPLAINT against CITY OF NEW YORK, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Officer Jane Doe, Officer John Doe 1, Officer John Doe 2, Officer John Doe 3, Carl M Stanton. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-27204761)Document filed by Junwu Gong. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Article, #2 Exhibit Article, #3 Exhibit Article, #4 Exhibit Article).(Freeth, Richard) Modified on 1/17/2023 (vf).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
