Ahmed v. Warden, Otisville, Camp FCI
Petitioner: Maroof Ahmed
Respondent: Warden, Otisville, Camp FCI
Case Number: 1:2023cv00454
Filed: January 13, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Paul G Gardephe
Referring Judge: Robert W Lehrburger
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 13, 2023 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Warden, Otisville, Camp FCI. Document filed by Maroof Ahmed..(rdz)
January 13, 2023 Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Maroof Ahmed..(rdz)
January 13, 2023 Case Designated ECF. (rdz)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ahmed v. Warden, Otisville, Camp FCI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Maroof Ahmed
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden, Otisville, Camp FCI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?