Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Perrigo, LLC
| Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. |
| Perrigo, LLC |
| 1:2023cv00698 |
| January 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Katherine Polk Failla |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice and without costs against the defendant(s) Perrigo, LLC. Document filed by Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Mitchell, Bradley) |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Perrigo, LLC..(gp) |
| Case Designated ECF. (gp) |
| Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (gp) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Katherine Polk Failla. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(gp) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Perrigo, LLC, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc...(Mitchell, Bradley) |
| Filing 3 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Limited for Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.. Document filed by Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc...(Mitchell, Bradley) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Mitchell, Bradley) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Perrigo, LLC. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-27257885)Document filed by Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc...(Mitchell, Bradley) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Perrigo, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Bradley Louis Mitchell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Perrigo, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
