Davis v. Horton et al
| Andre Jamel Davis |
| Sgt. Horton, PO Gonzalez, PO Calle, 9283 Jean and PO Sadita |
| 1:2023cv00885 |
| February 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| John P Cronan |
| Valerie Figueredo |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***NOTICE REGARDING REJECTION OF PROPOSED CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF DEFAULT re:document #13 Affirmation in Support, #12 Proposed Clerk's Certificate of Default #10 Proposed Clerk's Certificate of Default #11 Affirmation in Support #8 Proposed Clerk's Certificate of Default #15 Affirmation in Support #14 Proposed Clerk's Certificate of Default #9 Affirmation in Support was rejected by the Clerk's Office for the following reason(s): The proofs of service on the docket do not state that the summons and complaint was served on the defendants. The proofs of service do not state who the summons and complaint was served on. The clerk's certificate lists the wrong filed date for the proof of service. The clerk's certificate does not list the document number for the proof of service. Please file proofs of service that state the summons and complaint was served on each defendant. Once the proofs of service have been submitted, please submit new clerk's certificates and the supporting affirmation to the pro se office. (km) |
| Filing 15 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - AFFIRMATION of Andre J. Davis IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST FOR CERTIFICATE OF DEFAULT, re: #14 Proposed Clerk's Certificate of Default. Document filed by Calle. (sc) Modified on 3/23/2023 (km). |
| Filing 14 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - PROPOSED CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF DEFAULT. Document filed by Andre Jamel Davis. (sc) Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers). Modified on 3/23/2023 (km). |
| Filing 13 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - AFFIRMATION of Andre J. Davis IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST FOR CERTIFICATE OF DEFAULT,-+ re: #12 Proposed Clerk's Certificate of Default. Document filed by Andre Jamel Davis. (sc) Modified on 3/23/2023 (km). |
| Filing 12 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - PROPOSED CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF DEFAULT. Document filed by Andre Jamel Davis. (sc) Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers). Modified on 3/23/2023 (km). |
| Filing 11 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - AFFIRMATION of Andre J. Davis IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST FOR CERTIFICATE OF DEFAULT, re: #10 Proposed Clerk's Certificate of Default. Document filed by Andre Jamel Davis. (sc) Modified on 3/23/2023 (km). |
| Filing 10 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - PROPOSED CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF DEFAULT. Document filed by Andre Jamel Davis. (sc) Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers). Modified on 3/23/2023 (km). |
| Filing 9 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - AFFIRMATION of Andre J. Davis IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST FOR CERTIFICATE OF DEFAULT, re: #8 Proposed Clerk's Certificate of Default. Document filed by Andre Jamel Davis. (sc) Modified on 3/23/2023 (km). |
| Filing 8 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - PROPOSED CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF DEFAULT. Document filed by Andre Jamel Davis. (sc) Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers). Modified on 3/23/2023 (km). |
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. P.O. Gonzalez, served on 2/4/2023, answer due 2/27/2023. Service was accepted by Lt. Rivera, 50 Pct. Document filed by Andre Jamel Davis. (sc) |
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. Sgt. Horton, served on 2/4/2023, answer due 2/27/2023. Service was accepted by Lt. Rivera, 50 Pct. Document filed by Andre Jamel Davis. (sc) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. Calle, served on 2/4/2023, answer due 2/27/2023. Service was accepted by Lt. Rivera, 50 Pct. Document filed by Andre Jamel Davis. (sc) |
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. P.O. Sadita, served on 2/4/2023, answer due 2/27/2023. Service was accepted by Lt. Rivera. Document filed by Andre Jamel Davis. (sc) |
| MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 2. Mailed to: Andre Jamel Davis 5951 Riverdale Avenue #454 Bronx, NY 10471. (dsh) |
Filing 2
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for General Pretrial (includes scheduling, discovery, non-dispositive pretrial motions, and settlement) and Dispositive Motion (i.e., motion requiring a Report and Recommendation). Referred to Magistrate Judge Valerie Figueredo. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 2/6/2023) (jca)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Calle, Gonzalez, Horton, Jean, Sadita. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number 11944)Document filed by Andre Jamel Davis..(rdz) |
| Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
| Magistrate Judge Valerie Figueredo is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (rdz) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Calle, Gonzalez, Horton, Jean, Sadita..(rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
