Nock v. Spring Energy RRH, LLC et al
| Robert Nock |
| Spring Energy RRH, LLC and RRH Energy Services, LLC |
| 1:2023cv01042 |
| February 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
ORDER GRANTING JOSEPHINE ELIZABETH GRADDY'S MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE AS COUNSEL FOR THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT ENDURANCE SALES & MARKETING, LLC: THIS MATTER having come on to be heard on the Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as Counsel for Thir d-Party Defendant Endurance Sales & Marketing, LLC ("Motion"), filed by attorney Josephine Elizabeth Graddy pursuant to Rule 1.3 of the Local Rules of the United States District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, an d the Court having reviewed the Motion and accompanying Affidavit of Josephine Elizabeth Graddy and the Court's file and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is: ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion is GRANTED. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger on 4/19/2024) (mml)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER: NSL Marketing's request at Dkt. 82 to cancel the order to show cause hearing is denied. However, the hearing shall be converted to a conference held by Microsoft Teams. The public may dial in to the listen only line at (646)-453-4442, and enter access code 99950115 #. SO ORDERED. Copies transmitted this date to all counsel of record. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger on 4/12/2024) (mml) Modified on 4/12/2024 (mml).
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER granting 73 Letter Motion to Compel. Plaintiff's unopposed request at Dkt. 73 to extend discovery by 60 days until June 21, 2024 is GRANTED. By separate order, the Court will issue an order to show cause as requested by Plaintiff req uested in the same document. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the letter motion at Dkt. 73. SO ORDERED. Copies transmitted this date to all counsel of record. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger on 3/28/2024) (mml)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER: granting 71 Letter Motion for Discovery. The application for substitute service is granted. Service of the subpoena shall be made as requested and set forth in the highlighted (first full paragraph) on page 2 of this letter. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger on 3/01/2024) (ama)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER: granting 69 Letter Motion for Discovery. The request is granted. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. 502(d), Plaintiff's counsel offer (and fulfillment of that offer) to create and produce documents sufficient to show how and wherethey obtained the Recordings does not and will not waive any objections based on privilege or other protection with respect to any other document. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger on 2/09/2024) (ama)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER granting 58 Letter Motion to Seal. Granted. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger on 1/18/2024) (mml)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER granting 53 Letter Motion for Discovery. Granted. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger on 10/30/2023) (tg)
|
|
Filing
41
PROTECTIVE ORDER...regarding procedures to be followed that shall govern the handling of confidential material...SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jennifer H. Rearden on 7/25/23) (yv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
