Halberstam v. Concert Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
Adrienne Halberstam |
Concert Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Jesper Hiland, Richard H. Aldrich, Thomas G. Auchincloss, Jr., Christine van Heek, Peter Barton Hutt, Wilfred E. Jaeger, Roger D. Tung and Jesper Hoiland |
1:2023cv01131 |
February 9, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Ronnie Abrams |
Securities/Commodities |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice and without costs against the defendant(s) Christine van Heek, Concert Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Jesper Hoiland, Peter Barton Hutt, Richard H. Aldrich, Roger D. Tung, Thomas G. Auchincloss, Jr., Wilfred E. Jaeger. Document filed by Adrienne Halberstam. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Rogovin, Michael) |
Filing 5 ORDER AND NOTICE OF INITIAL CONFERENCE: This case has been assigned to me for all purposes. It is hereby: ORDERED that, by April 7, 2023, the parties submit a joint letter, not to exceed five (5) pages, providing the following information in separate paragraphs: As further set forth by this Order. Unless the parties request otherwise, the Court will hold this conference by telephone. The parties shall use the following dial-in information to call in to the conference: Call-in Number: (888) 363-4749; Access Code: 1015508. This conference line is open to the public. The initial conference will be held together with the parties in the related cases Wang v. Concert Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al. (23-CV-973); Jones v. Concert Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al. (23-CV-1018); and O'Dell v. Concert Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al. (23-CV-948). Plaintiff is ordered to serve Defendants with a copy of this order and to file an affidavit on ECF certifying that such service has been effectuated. SO ORDERED. Initial Conference set for 4/14/2023 at 04:00 PM before Judge Ronnie Abrams. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 2/21/2023) (tg) |
Filing 4 ORDER AND NOTICE OF INITIAL CONFERENCE: This case has been assigned to me for all purposes. It is hereby: ORDERED that, by April 7, 2023, the parties submit a joint letter, not to exceed five (5) pages, providing the following information in separate paragraphs: as set forth herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by April 7, 2023, the parties jointly submit to the Court a proposed case management plan and scheduling order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for all parties appear for an initial status conference on April 14, 2023 at 4:00 p.m. If Defendants have not yet been properly served, has not filed a responsive pleading, and/or the parties otherwise seek to adjourn the conference, they shall notify the Court by no later than April 7, 2023. Unless the parties request otherwise, the Court will hold this conference by telephone. The parties shall use the following dial-in information to call in to the conference: Call-in Number: (888) 363-4749; Access Code: 1015508. This conference line is open to the public. The initial conference will be held together with the parties in the related cases Halberstam v. Concert Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al. (23-CV-1131); Jones v. Concert Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al. (23-CV-1018); and Wang v. Concert Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al. (23-CV-973). Plaintiff is ordered to serve Defendants with a copy of this order and to file an affidavit on ECF certifying that such service has been effectuated. SO ORDERED.Telephonic Initial Conference set for 4/14/2023 at 04:00 PM before Judge Ronnie Abrams. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 2/21/2023) (ama) |
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Ronnie Abrams. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (vba) |
Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vba) |
CASE ACCEPTED AS RELATED. Create association to 1:23-cv-00948-RA. Notice of Assignment to follow. (vba) |
CASE REFERRED TO Judge Ronnie Abrams as possibly related to 1:23-cv-00948. (vf) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Michael Allen Rogovin. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Jesper Hiland. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name contained a typographical error. (vf) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Unassigned. (vf) |
Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
Filing 3 STATEMENT OF RELATEDNESS re: that this action be filed as related to 1:23-cv-00948-RA. Document filed by Adrienne Halberstam..(Rogovin, Michael) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Rogovin, Michael) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Christine van Heek, Concert Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Jesper Hiland, Peter Barton Hutt, Richard H. Aldrich, Roger D. Tung, Thomas G. Auchincloss, Jr., Wilfred E. Jaeger. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-27322696)Document filed by Adrienne Halberstam..(Rogovin, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.