Lee v. United States of America
| Rodell Lee |
| Luis Rios and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 1:2023cv01710 |
| February 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Analisa Torres |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2672 mv Federal Tort Claims Act - Motor Vehicle |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint served. Service was accepted by Derrick Mayers. Document filed by Rodell Lee..(Olmstead, Joshua) |
| Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. United States of America served on 3/15/2023. Service was accepted by Derrick Mayers. Document filed by Rodell Lee..(Olmstead, Joshua) |
| Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to United States of America, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General..(gp) |
| Filing 7 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Rodell Lee..(Olmstead, Joshua) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING REMOVAL OF PARTY. Notice to attorney Joshua C. Olmstead. The following party/parties has been removed from this case: Luis Rios. The party was added to the case in error. (jgo) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney Joshua C. Olmstead to RE-FILE Document No. #6 Request for Issuance of Summons. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the PDF attached to the docket entry for the issuance of summons is not correct; party name on the PDF 'To' section is not a party of record;. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (jgo) |
| Filing 6 FILING ERROR - SUMMONS REQUEST PDF ERROR - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Rodell Lee..(Olmstead, Joshua) Modified on 3/7/2023 (jgo). |
Filing 5
INITIAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Counsel for all parties are directed to submit a joint letter and a jointly proposed Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order by May 1, 2023, in accordance with Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the instructions set forth below. (As further set forth in this Order.) SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 3/3/2023) (vfr)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER: To conserve resources, to promote judicial efficiency, and in an effort to achieve a faster disposition of this matter, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge, counsel for Defendant shall, by May 1, 2023, file a fully executed Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form, as further set forth herein. If any party does not consent to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge, the parties must file a joint letter, by May 1, 2023, advising the Court that the parties do not consent, but without disclosing the identity of the party or parties who do not consent. The parties are free to withhold consent without negative consequences. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 3/3/2023) (vfr)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER: To protect the public health, while promoting the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding," Fed. R. Civ. P. 1, it is ORDERED pursuant to Rules 30(b)(3) and 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that all depositions in this action may be taken via telephone, videoconference, or other remote means. It is further ORDERED pursuant to Rule 30(b)(5) that a deposition will be deemed to have taken place "before an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28" if such officer attends the deposition using the same remote means used to connect all other participants, so long as all participants (including the officer) can clearly hear and be heard by all other participants. The parties are encouraged to engage in discovery through remote means at every available opportunity. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 3/3/2023) (vfr)
|
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Olmstead, Joshua) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-27405139)Document filed by Rodell Lee..(Olmstead, Joshua) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Analisa Torres. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(gp) |
| Case Designated ECF. (gp) |
| Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (gp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
