BAE Systems Information and Electronic Systems Integration Inc. v. L3Harris Cincinnati Electronics Corporation
BAE Systems Information and Electronic Systems Integration Inc. |
L3Harris Cincinnati Electronics Corporation and L |
1:2023cv01860 |
March 3, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Defend Trade Secrets Act (of 2016) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Defendant L3Harris Cincinnati Electronics Corporation, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by BAE Systems Information and Electronic Systems Integration Inc...(Fiebig, Rebecca) |
Filing 3 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent BAE Systems Holdings, Inc., Corporate Parent BAE Systems, (Holdings), Ltd., Corporate Parent BAE Systems, plc., Corporate Parent BAE Systems, Inc. for BAE Systems Information and Electronic Systems Integration Inc.. Document filed by BAE Systems Information and Electronic Systems Integration Inc...(Fiebig, Rebecca) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Fiebig, Rebecca) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against L3Harris Cincinnati Electronics Corporation. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-27421406)Document filed by BAE Systems Information and Electronic Systems Integration Inc...(Fiebig, Rebecca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.