G.B. et al v. New York City Department of Education
| G.B. and M.B. |
| New York City Department of Education |
| 1:2023cv02180 |
| March 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Vernon S Broderick |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 20 U.S.C. ยง 1400 IDEA: Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (short title) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 SECOND LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer On Consent addressed to Judge Vernon S. Broderick from Thomas Lindeman dated April 26, 2023. Document filed by New York City Department of Education..(Lindeman, Thomas) |
Filing 8
ORDER denying #7 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #7 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer addressed to Judge Vernon S. Broderick from Thomas Lindeman dated April 3, 2023., #1 Complaint. Defendant's request for a 90 day extension to answer the complaint is DENIED. Defendants are ORDERED to answer the complaint by April 28, 2023. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 4/4/2023) (kv) (Main Document 8 replaced on 4/14/2023) (kv).
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: New York City Department of Education answer due 4/28/2023. (kv) |
| Filing 7 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer addressed to Judge Vernon S. Broderick from Thomas Lindeman dated April 3, 2023. Document filed by New York City Department of Education..(Lindeman, Thomas) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Thomas Lindeman on behalf of New York City Department of Education..(Lindeman, Thomas) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. New York City Department of Education served on 3/15/2023, answer due 4/5/2023. Document filed by M.B.(On behalf of T.B.); G.B.(Individually); M.B.(Individually); G.B.(On behalf of T.B.)..(DeVinney, William) |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to New York City Department of Education..(jgo) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Vernon S. Broderick. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo) |
| Magistrate Judge James L. Cott is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo) |
| Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(DeVinney, William) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to New York City Department of Education, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by G.B.(Individually), G.B.(On behalf of T.B.), M.B.(On behalf of T.B.), M.B.(Individually)..(DeVinney, William) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against New York City Department of Education. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-27468046)Document filed by M.B.(On behalf of T.B.), G.B.(Individually), M.B.(Individually), G.B.(On behalf of T.B.)..(DeVinney, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
