Thompson v. The Port Authority of New York et al
| Anthony Thompson |
| The Port Authority of New York, New York Port Authority Police Sergeant Brant Maynard and Port Authority Police Officers John and Jane Does Numbers 1-10 |
| 1:2023cv02212 |
| March 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Jennifer H Rearden |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 nr Notice of Removal |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 STATUS REPORT. (Joint Status Report) Document filed by New York Port Authority Police Sergeant Brant Maynard, The Port Authority of New York. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Civil Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order).(Kromm, David) |
Filing 8
NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Initial Conference, via Microsoft Teams, set for 5/10/2023 at 12:45 PM before Judge Jennifer H. Rearden. The parties will receive log-in credentials via email. The public listen-only line may be accessed by dialing 646-453-4442 and entering Conference ID: 507 177 742#. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jennifer H. Rearden on 4/24/2023) (vfr)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Justin M Loveland on behalf of Anthony Thompson..(Loveland, Justin) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Caitlin Anne Robin on behalf of Anthony Thompson..(Robin, Caitlin) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Defendants' Answer served on Caitlin Robin, Esq. on March 22, 2023. Service was made by FedEx. Document filed by New York Port Authority Police Sergeant Brant Maynard, The Port Authority of New York..(Kromm, David) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND. Document filed by New York Port Authority Police Sergeant Brant Maynard, The Port Authority of New York..(Kromm, David) |
| Case Designated ECF. (gp) |
| Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (gp) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Jennifer H. Rearden. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(gp) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Notice of Removal and Accompanying Documents served on Caitlin Robin, Esq. on 3/15/2023. Service was made by FedEx. Document filed by New York Port Authority Police Sergeant Brant Maynard, The Port Authority of New York..(Kromm, David) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Kromm, David) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Supreme Court, County of New York. Case Number: 151760/2023. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-27472302).Document filed by New York Port Authority Police Sergeant Brant Maynard, The Port Authority of New York. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Copy of All Process and Pleadings Received by Defendants, #2 Exhibit B - Notice of Consent to Removal).(Kromm, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
